|
|

|
The Consequences of Bourgeois Chic: Exploitation, Racial Hatred, and
Dependency on Imported Cheap Labor
by Michael Lopez-Calderon
(Following article is
in response to Deborah
Sontag's "Death and Daily Life Link Arab and Israeli", published
in the New York Times, Friday, May 02, 2001)
Political conservatives
frequently bemoan the demise of the “work ethic” and erosion of the
“entrepreneurial spirit,” both considered the lifeblood or “mojo”
if you will, of capitalism. But as the now unwisely discarded Marxian
criticisms of capitalism’s built-in contradictions point out, the source
for much of the conservatives’ ire is imbedded within the very
political-economic system they revere. In the advanced capitalist
economies of Germany, the United States, and even Great Britain, and in
extraordinarily wealthy developing countries like those in the Gulf
region, reliance upon imported, contracted labor is widespread.
Incidentally, the US government generally denies this practice exists here
in America; however, one need only look at the agricultural and hi-tech
sectors to see that both serve as magnets drawing in hundreds of thousands
of low wage laborers.
In Saudi Arabia, reliance upon
“expatriate workers” as they are euphemistically called, was so
widespread that a virtual “security threat” emerged. The Saudis had
imported nearly two million South Koreans during the early 1980s. They
were mostly young men, and Saudi officials soon discovered that the
majority of them had military training. Anyone who has been to Saudi
Arabia in the past decade (I lived there in 1992) must have noticed a
large number of Filipino, Pakistani, Sudanese, and Sri Lankan male and
female laborers, but gone were the huge numbers of South Koreans. The
Saudis discovered these nationalities were more malleable than the South
Koreans; the latter did not take too kindly to employer abuses.
In Kuwait prior to 1990, most
of the professionals were Palestinians, who despite their years spent
there, were denied citizenship. Little wonder that when Saddam Hussein’s
army stormed Kuwait City on August 2, 1990, the Palestinians by and large
welcomed it as a liberation army.
In Germany, most of neo-Nazi
violence is directed not at the 88,000 German Jews, but instead at the
Turkish “ausländische Arbeitnehmer” or “Gastarbeiter,” menial
laborers who do the necessary but low wage tasks that a majority of
Germans will no longer perform.
And in the US, one of the
reasons why Americans on average spend a smaller portion of their annual
income on food expenses can be explained by the extraordinarily
backbreaking and unappreciated work of Hispanic farm laborers. In all the
cases cited above, the national citizens of these countries have for years
refused to take a number of menial, dirty, demeaning, and backbreaking
jobs. They have adopted a bourgeois chic posture that says, “We’re too
good to get dirt under our fingernails.”
Enter Israel: The Jewish State
officially joined the ranks of “developed nations” in 1997, when the
United Nations moved her into that category. Gone now are the Zionists’
quasi-socialist and romantic, heroic celebrations of Jewish manual
laborers. During the past three decades Palestinians have performed the
menial service sector, agricultural, and construction-related tasks. And
now with the Al-Aqsa Intifada in its seventh month, more Israelis than
ever before are calling for the importation of cheap labor from around the
world.
A plantation mentality will
soon develop as more and more Israelis move into hi-tech employment and
leave behind the world of manual work. Worse, the plantation mindset will
be amplified by an over-dependency on the guest worker (“Gastarbeiter”),
who more often than not derives from a developing country. Thus as a
“person of color,” the guest worker not only faces low wages, low
esteem, and employer abuse, he or she also must deal with ethnic and or
racial bigotry. We read about such a process in Deborah Sontag’s New
York Times’ article, “Death and Daily Life Link Arab and Israeli”
(May 2, 2001). There is an interesting comment by an Israeli settler cited
in the passage below:
“Mr. [Zevulun] Boneh said
that he believed that settlement expansion would be an effective response
as would economic suffocation of the Palestinians. "I say to my
friends, `Don't give any work to Arabs,'" he said. `That's the only
way to get them to leave the country. If you need to expand your homes,
tell the contractors to bring Romanian workers, bring Thais. We can't say
kill them or transfer them, but in our own little way, slowly, slowly and
elegantly, we can chase them away."
Mr. Boneh noted that the new
porch on which the mourners were gathering had been built by Palestinians
from the neighboring village.”
Notice that Mr. Boneh did not
seem to object to the idea of genocide, just that it would be impolite to
express in public support for such a policy. His comment “but in our own
little way, slowly, slowly and elegantly, we can chase them away” is the
essence of the Zionist agenda towards the indigenous population, unchanged
since its inception began in 1897. It is what MIT professor Noam Chomsky
has called Israel’s “slow motion genocide” of the Palestinians. And
Mr. Boneh’s blunt but honest quote reveals the true motive behind
Israel’s military governance of the occupied West Bank, Gaza, East
Jerusalem, and Golan Heights: to chase away the Palestinians, to drive
them into the sea of the desert.
But with an over-dependency on
Romanian, Thai, and other non-Palestinian low-wage laborers, Israel will
expose more and more sectors of the human population to her polices of
Apartheid and religious-ethnic exclusivity. Soon, more nationalities will
experience firsthand that Israeli society’s antipathy toward the
Palestinians is really a manifestation of an anti-Gentile animus deeply
rooted in Zionist ideology. As we witnessed yesterday’s well-deserved
expulsion of Israel’s “Master Simon Legree”, a.k.a. the US, from the
UN Human Rights Commission, we should note that the twenty-sixth year
anniversary of UN General Assembly Resolution 3379 (November 10, 1975),
that equated Zionism with racism, remains as relevant today as it was back
then. Mr. Boneh’s comment confirms the UN’s wisdom.
Mr. Michael
Lopez-Calderon taught High School Social Studies in Miami, Florida for
seven years until March 2, 2001, when he was asked to leave the Jewish Day
school where he had taught for the past five years. Michael was asked to
leave for having posted pro-Palestinian comments on Palestine Media
Watch's subscriber-only e-mail. He remains an activist in the Miami area.
Source:
|

|
|