Comedy enriches the soul. Somewhere, someone once said
that laughter is the best medicine.
Unfortunately, last Saturday, CNN’s Reliable Sources
segment proved that laughter is a bitter chalice of poison.
The issue at hand was the so-called tilt in U.S. media
towards favorable coverage of the Palestinians at the Israelis’ expense.
Favorable coverage of the Palestinians? Talk about delusional journalism.
Indeed, guests Lally Weymouth of Newsweek, and Rich Lowry
of National Review assailed alleged skewed reporting in U.S. media that
painted the Palestinians as victims and the Israelis as evil-doers. “The
images (of Palestinian deaths and suffering) have to be taken in context,”
Lowry explained.
This may go down well with the general U.S. viewing public
where literacy has become a household joke; it does not bode well for the
rest of the world.
I wonder what context Lowry is referring to when
Palestinian children, as young as four months, are shown with half their
brains spewed unto the ground. Perhaps, the cameras neglected to show the
four-month-old infant throwing a Molotov cocktail at heavily-armed Israeli
soldiers. Or, even more baffling, is the lapse in memory of broadcast
journalists in failing to report how a Palestinian mother, shielding her
children from an Israeli attack in her own home, was left to bleed to
death in front of them as the all-generous, ever-pitiful Israeli soldiers
prevented medical assistance from reaching her.
This is pure drivel and has brought U.S. journalism down
into its darkest hour. One need only switch to BBC World (which is readily
available in North America) or even Canada’s CBC to catch slightly less
biased coverage of world events.
Last week, Weymouth interviewed Israeli Prime Minister
Ariel Sharon for Newsweek’s (April 1, 2002 issue) cover story “How Will
Israel Survive?” Her interview, titled “There’s a War On”, painted the
most dignified picture yet of a man that is considered by his own military
to be the Butcher of Beirut, where some 2,000 Palestinian civilians
(civilians, not militants and not terrorists, but civilians) were
butchered by Israel’s allies, the Phalange.
Reading through Weymouth’s pathetic portfolio of articles
and interviews with Israelis in the past year, one comes away with the
feeling that there is none more ardent a pro-Israeli Arab-basher than her.
In a CNN segment concerning her interview with Sharon, Weymouth almost
seemed to cry as she told the viewing public how gentle and endearing a
man Sharon is.
Sharon droppings might be considered sacred to her.
A woman who extols a mass murderer in such fashion can
only be considered to share in his crime. A network that resorts to such
incredible bias as a “reliable source” is also considered guilty for the
burden Palestinians must endure.
I am perfectly happy to tutor Lowry and Weymouth in the
finer, more delicate aspects of international journalism. I will not
charge them a red cent - I will just consider it charity work for the
disabled.