Soon, delegates to the United Nations World Conference
against Racism, Racial Discrimination, Xenophobia and Related Intolerance
will assemble in Durban, South Africa, and possibly debate a resolution
equating Zionism with racism.
That we should have to debate this issue in 2001 is
regrettable, for the General Assembly has already decided the matter. On
Nov. 10, 1975, it passed Resolution 3379, which, among other things,
reaffirmed the UN's condemnation of the
"unholy alliance between South African racism
(Resolution 3151G, 1953), and further condemned "any
doctrine of racial differentiation or superiority [to be] scientifically
false, morally condemnable, socially unjust and dangerous,"
(Res. 1904, 1963).
Even more regrettable is the reticence of Mary Robinson,
United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights, to revisit the issue:
"If there is an attempt to revive the idea of
Zionism as racism we will not have a successful conference."
(Toronto Globe and Mail, July 28).
I submit that a
conference that willfully ignored the worst sustained human rights
violation of the last 60 years is irredeemably compromised. By this
willful sin of omission it will tacitly condone the very kind racism it
purports to abhor.
Even a cursory examination of the Zionist enterprise and
statements by its practitioners provides ample prima facie proof
that Zionism is, has been, and will always be, racist.
Zionism as racism
"Both the process of expropriation and removal of the poor
must be carried out discreetly and circumspectly." Theodore Herzl in
The Complete Diaries, Chapter I, p. 88.
"The Palestinian refugees will
find their place in the diaspora. Those who can resist will live thanks to
natural selection. The others will simply crumble. Some of them will
persist, but the majority will be a human heap, the scum of the earth, and
will sink into the lowest levels of the Arab world,"
Near East Department of the Israeli government, 1948.
"There is no other way than to transfer the Arabs from
here to the neighboring countries, to transfer all of them; not one
village, not one tribe, should be left." Joseph Weitz, the Jewish National
Fund administrator for Zionist colonization (1967), from My Diary and
Letters to the Children, Chapter III, p. 293.
"The only good Arab is a dead Arab...When we have settled
the land, all the Arabs will be able to do about it will be to scurry
around like drugged cockroaches in a bottle,"
Rafael Eitan, Likud leader of the Tsomet faction (1981) in Noam Chomsky,
Fateful Triangle, pp 129, 130.
"It is forbidden to be merciful to them, you must give
them missiles, with relish - annihilate them. Evil ones, damnable ones.
May the Holy Name visit retribution on the Arabs' heads, and cause their
seed to be lost, and annihilate them, and cause them to be vanquished and
cause them to be cast from the world," Rabbi Ovadia Yosef, founder and
spiritual leader of the Shas party, Ma'ariv,
April, 9, 2001.
In reaction to Yosef's
statements, Interior minister Eli Yesha said supportively:
"They reflected the overall state of thinking of
the Israeli Jewish society."
These five citations, from Herzl to the present, show that
Zionism is, at root, a conscious war of extermination and expropriation
against a native civilian population. In the modern vernacular,
Zionism is the theory and practice of "ethnic
cleansing," which the UN has defined as a war
Unfortunately, justice doesn't
always win against a determined campaign of disinformation and
intimidation. In 1991, under intense pressure from Israel and the North
American Jewish lobby, the UN reversed itself on Zionism, thereby denying
the truth it spoke 16 years earlier.
The Zionist argument, then as now, consists of the
falsehood that the UN's action itself
constituted an act of racism. Zionism, we are told, is merely the national
expression of Jewish self-determination. Thus, to condemn Zionism is to
condemn all Jewry--an act of "anti-Semitism."
The epithet "anti-Semitism"
is hurled to silence anyone, even other Jews, brave enough to decry Israel's
systematic, decades-long pogrom against the Palestinian Arabs. Because of
the Holocaust, "anti-Semitism"
is such a powerful instrument of emotional blackmail that it effectively
pre-empts rational discussion of Israel and its conduct.
It is for this reason that many good people can witness
daily evidence of Israeli inhumanity toward the "Palestinians'
collective punishment," destruction of olive groves, routine
harassment, judicial prejudice, denial of medical services,
assassinations, torture, apartheid-based segregation, etc.
yet not denounce it for fear of being branded "anti-Semitic."
To be free to acknowledge Zionism's
racist nature, therefore, one must debunk the calumny of
this is done, not only will the criminality of Israel be undeniable, but
Israel, itself, will be shown to be the embodiment of the very
anti-Semitism it purports to condemn.
Zionism as anti-Semitism (general case)
First, we need to
rectify one major misunderstanding. The words "Semite"
and "Semitic" refer to
more than Jews and Jewishness. Strictly speaking, "semitic" is a
linguistic term denoting a family of Afro-Asiatic languages, of which we
have today Arabic, Hebrew, Maltese, and the South Arabic languages of
Ancient semitic languages included Akkadian, Sumerian,
Canaanite, Amorite, Ugaritic, Phoenician, Punic, Aramaic, as well as
ancient Hebrew and Syriac.
Thus, anyone who spoke or speaks these languages is by
definition a Semite, though the term only came into use in 1813. In the
case of the Middle East, Semites include the Palestinian Arabs. Not only
do they speak a semitic language (Arabic), but they are the direct blood
descendants of the Canaanites, whom we know as the Philistines.
Now, the Zionist Jews who founded Israel are another
matter. For the most part, they are not Semites, and their language
(Yiddish) is not semitic. These Ashkenazi ("German")
Jews -- as opposed to the Sephardic ("Spanish")
Jews -- have no connection whatever to any of
the aforementioned ancient peoples or languages.
They are mostly East European Slavs descended from the
Khazars, a nomadic Turko-Finnic people that migrated out of the Caucasus
in the second century and came to settle, broadly speaking, in what is now
Southern Russia and Ukraine.
In A.D. 740, the khagan (ruler) of Khazaria, decided that
paganism wasn't good enough for his people and
decided to adopt one of the "heavenly"
religions: Judaism, Christianity or Islam. After a process of elimination
he chose Judaism, and from that point the Khazars adopted Judaism as the
official state religion.
The history of the Khazars and their conversion is a
documented, undisputed part of Jewish history, but it is never publicly
discussed. It is, as former U.S. State Department official Alfred M.
Lilienthal declared, "Israel's
Achilles heel," for it proves that Zionists have
no claim to the land of the Biblical Hebrews.
Thus what we know as the "Jewish
State" of Israel is really an ethnocentric
garrison state established by a non-Semitic people for the declared
purpose of dispossessing and terrorizing a civilian semitic people. In
fact from Nov. 27, 1947, to May 15, 1948, more
that 300,000 Arabs were forced from their homes and villages. By the end
of the year, the number was close to 800,000 by Israeli estimates. Today,
Palestinian refugees number in the millions.
That the Jews knew they were committing a criminal act is
shown by a eulogy Foreign Minister Moshe Dayan delivered for a Jew killed
by Arabs on the Gaza border in 1956:
"Let us not heap accusations on
the murderers," he said. "How
can we complain about their deep hatred for us? For eight years they have
been sitting in the Gaza refugee camps, and before their very eyes, we are
possessing the land and the villages where they and their ancestors have
lived. We are the generation of colonizers, and without the steel helmet
and the gun barrel we cannot plant a tree and build a home."
In April 1969, Dayan told the Jewish newspaper Ha'aretz:
"There is not one single place built in this
country that did not have a former Arab population."
Clearly, the equation of Zionism with racism is founded on
solid historical evidence, and the charge of anti-Semitism is absurd.
Zionism as anti-Semitism (specific case)
Despite the preceding evidence, Zionists still have one
rhetorical weapon that must be defused: the claim that the state of Israel
is necessary because Jews need a safe haven from "anti-Semitism"
in the non-Jewish world. Zionists insist that anti-Semitism is solely a
crime against Jews, and that criticism of Zionism is by definition an
attack upon Jews, a denigration of the Holocaust, and therefore
The image of Israel as a necessary bastion for Jews is
compelling enough to convince reasonable people that equating Zionism with
racism is morally wrong. This was especially true in the immediate
post-war world: "Generally speaking, the
Zionists succeeded in persuading large segments of world public opinion to
link the Zionist cause with the Holocaust,"
wrote Professor Ilan Pappé of Haifa University. "Against
such a claim, even able Palestinian diplomats -- and
there were not many in those days --
could hardly win the diplomatic game." The
Journal of Palestine Studies (Winter 1997).
The equation of Zionism with the Holocaust, though, is
based on a false presumption. Far from being a haven for all Jews, Israel
is founded by Zionist Jews who helped the Nazis fill the gas chambers and
stoke the ovens of the death camps. Israel would not be possible today if
the World Zionist Congress and other Zionist agencies hadn't
formed common cause with Hitler's exterminators
to rid Europe of Jews.
In exchange for helping round up non-Zionist Jews,
sabotage Jewish resistance movements, and betray the trust of Jews,
Zionists secured for themselves safe passage to Palestine. This
arrangement was formalized in a number of emigration agreements signed in
1938. The most notorious case of Zionist collusion concerned Dr. Rudolf Kastner Chairman of the Zionist Organization in Hungary from 1943-45. To
secure the safe passage of 600 Zionists to Palestine, he helped the Nazis
send 800,000 Hungarian Jews to their deaths. The Israeli Supreme Court
virtually whitewashed Kastner's crimes because
to admit them would have denied Israel the moral right to exist.
As the Jewish-Israeli scholar Benjamin Beit-Hallahmi
wrote: "Out of the original sins of the world
against the Jews grew the original sins of
Zionism against the Palestinians: Its memory
poisons the blood and marks every moment of existence."
(Original Sins -- Reflections of the History
of Zionism and Israel. p.
If this horror seems incredible or aberrant, it shouldn't.
In a letter to the Zionist executive on Dec. 17, 1938, David Ben-Gurion
stated it openly and unapologetically: "The
saving of Jewish lives from Hitler is considered here as a potential
threat to Zionism, unless they are brought to Palestine. When Zionism had
to choose between the Jewish people and the Jewish state, it
unhesitatingly preferred the latter...
"Zionism accepts anti-Semitism
as the natural, normal attitude of the non-Jewish world toward the Jew. It
does not consider it as a distorted, perverted phenomenon; it is a
response to anti-Semitism, but not a confrontation, denunciation or fight
against it." (Faris Yahya, Zionist Relations
with Nazi Germany, p. 78.)
Even today, pro-Israeli journalists and publishers play up
acts of violence against Jews to give the illusion that anti-Semitism is
rampant and to manufacture consent for Zionism as a virtuous, necessary
ideology. Journalists who try present a balanced view of Israel, to say
nothing of a critical one, are silenced or terrorized. This goes for Jews
as well as non-Jews.
On Nov. 10, 2000, the American-Jewish editor in chief of
the Kansas City Jewish Chronicle, Debbie Ducro, published an
impassioned 1,150 word article from another Jew decrying Israeli
atrocities against the Palestinians. The writer, Judith Stone, even used
the term Israeli Shoah, to draw allusion to Hitler's
genocidal war against the Jews. Ducro was fired on Nov. 11.
In San Francisco, Rabbi Michael Lerner has endured death
threats and vicious harassment from right-wing Jews because he gives voice
to Palestinian views on his website and in the magazine Tikkun.
"An Israeli web site called
'self-hate' has identified me as one of
the five enemies of the Jewish people, and printed my home address and
driving instructions on how to get to my home,"
wrote Lerner in a May 13 e-mail. "We reported
this to the police, the Israeli consulate, and to the Anti Defamation
league. The ADL said it wasn't their concern because this was not a
Here's a typical letter that
Lerner said Tikkun received: "You
subhuman leftist animals. You should all be exterminated. You are the
lowest of the low life" (David Raziel in
If anyone other than a Jew had written this, you can be
sure that the ADL and any other Jewish lobby groups would have gone into
full attack mode. In other words, when non-Jews slander and threaten Jews,
it's called "anti-Semitism"
and "hate crime'; when
Zionists slander and threaten Jews, nobody is supposed to notice.
War crimes occur when cruelty is made to appear honourable,
and good people stand by and do nothing to stop it.
The world watched as the Nazis unleashed state-sanctioned
terrorism against the Jews, who were deemed to be sub-human
(Untermenschen) - not worthy of dignity,
respect or legal protection under the law. To kill a Jew, to destroy his
livelihood, to force him and his family out of their homes
- these were accepted, sanctioned forms of conduct by citizens of
the German Reich to rid Europe of a specific group of people.
Today, the world watches as Israelis unleash
state-sanctioned terrorism against Palestinians, who are deemed to be
sub-human (Untermenschen) - not worthy of
dignity, respect or legal protection under the law. (See citations above.)
To kill a Palestinian, to destroy his livelihood, to force him and his
family out of their homes - these are accepted,
sanctioned forms of conduct by citizens of the Zionist Reich designed to
rid Palestine of a specific group of people.
If Nazism is racist and deserving of absolute censure,
then so is Zionism, for they are both fruit of the poisonous tree of
fascism. It cannot be considered "anti-Semitic"
to acknowledge this fact.
To condemn Israeli terrorism, does not in any way imply
animus against Jews; neither does it attempt to diminish the Holocaust. In
fact, the opposite is true. Zionists did nothing to aid non-Zionist
survivors of the death camps, and did everything they could to coerce them
to come to Palestine. For Zionists, the only Jew worth saving from the
camps was one who wanted to build the Jewish State.
As famed violinist Lord Yehudi Menuhin told the French
newspaper Le Figaro in January 1988: "It is extraordinary how
nothing ever dies completely. Even the evil which prevailed yesterday in
Nazi Germany is gaining ground in that country [Israel] today."
For it to have any moral authority, the UN must equate
Zionism with racism. If it doesn't, it tacitly condones Israel's
war of extermination against the Palestinians.
Mr. Greg Felton is a Canadian editorialist on international politics, especially the Middle East. He can be reached at