by Cathleen Hall
After reading for many days about the
conflict in the Mid East, I am just in shock and disbelief. Maybe
I am fairly naïve to think that it is so straightforward. I have
seen many, many documents showing Israel’s land and borders of
1967, which of course have been disputed for many years. However,
what I do not understand, is that since Israel and the majority of
the Western world agree to the 1967 borders, which give back the
West Bank and Gaza very clearly and succinctly to the
Palestinians, why it is that there is even so much as one single
Israeli inside those areas. Let’s not even get into the pre
1967-border issue here. For the moment, let us only concentrate on
those borders to which Israel has agreed.
I mean if you think about it, they have
basically annexed all the other lands, and have agreed to the West
Bank and Gaza not belonging to them. And yet somehow if you look at
a current map,
http://www.csmonitor.com/2002/0404/csmimg/0404p9b.jpg, there is
so little Palestinian rule and control especially in the West Bank.
Somehow I thought that if a land belongs to you, you would actually
be able to control it, you would not have invaders present who would
then negotiate the terms under which they would leave. If I go into
my local bank right now, though it belongs to the bank, and I settle
myself there and say I will not leave, until this, that or the
other, they call the SWAT team on me. If I then harm someone in that
bank, or take someone inside that bank as my prisoner, I think they
call that a hostage situation.
Am I the only one who can see this? Sometimes,
I think perhaps the entire world has lost their minds. How can
something so clearly defined (again for this purpose lets not even
address the fact that the Palestinians have more right to land then
the 1967 borders), be so confusing to most of the world? If the
Israelis have agreed to this 1967 border, then WHY ARE THEY IN THE
WEST BANK AND GAZA?
Maybe I am loosing my mind; I just cannot
figure this one out.
Then I read comments by leaders saying that
Arafat has gotten himself into this mess by missing opportunities,
and I just do not understand that. Are we going to do that in
Afghanistan as well? If so, I must say, I am completely ashamed to
be an American citizen. Prior to World War II, border disputes,
wars, and changing of the country’s lines were pretty much an
everyday occurrence. I mean just look how many times Alsace Lorraine
went back and forth between Germany and France. I still know of many
bitter feelings towards the French from the Germans due to the
eventual turn over of this area to the French, due in part to
Hitler’s atrocities. But this is 2002; our borders do not change by
the day.
I guess I cannot expect America, who seems to
be the big brother of this whole mess, to force Israel to get out of
the West Bank and Gaza, seeing as how we have dealt with our native
citizens by giving them a stipend and a small strip of land. But
somehow, I think that is exactly why we should know better. I would
think that we would have learned our lesson and know when a crime is
being committed and therefore want to prevent others from taking
similar actions. Similar to how a parent would have made many
mistakes while they themselves were children, therefore, when they
see their child doing the same thing, they would try their best to
stop the child. I suppose that maybe we are just easing our guilt by
saying "Hey they are doing it too, so we cannot be so bad." Or perhaps
we are all just blind. I know what I see when I look at the map of
the 1967 borders. When will the rest of the world see it as well?