Media Monitors Network

.....where truth prevails

Posted: December 20, 2000

Toll-free: 1 866 MediaNet 

E-mail: Editor@MediaMonitors.net

 

 

 

 

 

 

Ray Hanania's Column

 
 
Bush Victory already aiming to harm Arab Interests 

 

 
by Ray Hanania
 
Arabs and Muslim voters have yet to understand the most basic principle of the American political process: Candidate's lie and say anything to get elected.
 
The most bruising example for Arab Americans will be the next four years of the administration of George W. Bush as president.
 
Although Bush received the backing of a Muslim "voting bloc"
and support of Arab American groups acting independently throughout the United States, the new president intends to pursue policies that openly contradict Arab American and Muslim interests.
 
That should not be surprising to those who carefully monitored Bushes' campaign rhetoric or who recalled the policies of his father, former President George Bush who served from 1988 until 1992.
 
And while it is still early to make firm predictions, the early signs are
very troubling to Arab American and Muslim interests, possibly misled by inexperienced individuals who still view politics as if they were back home in the "Old Country."
 
The first clue of trouble should have been Bushes' selection of Dick Cheney as his vice presidential running mate. Cheney was Secretary of Defense under George's father, and directed the brutal military campaign against Iraq.
 
But, it has been 10 years and you can't fault someone for forgetting the suffering and misery of the people of Iraq after so many years of neglect.
 
The Bush election victory was finally confirmed Dec. 18 by a vote of the "Electoral College" and it didn't take Bush long to show his true colors. His first appointment is Colin Powell for Secretary of State, a position that is instrumental in directing all American policies toward the Arab World. Powell served as Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff during the brutal 1991 war against Iraq.
 
Powell was initially a "pacifist" when it came to sanctions against Iraq --arguing most recently in his1995 autobiography ("My American Journey") that "sanctions rarely work against them (dictators)" but instead only tend to harm the civilian population brutalized by a dictator like Saddam Hussein.
 
Today, however, he has experienced a change of heart. After Bush announced that he would be the first formal cabinet appointment, Powell immediately announced that he would push for both enforcement and extension of the sanctions against Iraq.
 
According to Powell's aides, the Secretary of State nominee believes that the sanctions, which have resulted in the death of more than 500,000 Iraqi children and more than 2 million Iraqi adults, is necessary to "contain" Saddam Hussein.
 
Do you think it has anything to do with the fact that Bushes' father, the former president, still harbors a personal resentment against Saddam Hussein, who is an unrepentant barbarian and murderer?
 
It was there for all to see, but too many Arab Americans and the so-called "Muslim Voting Bloc" could not see beyond their inert hatred of Al Gore because Gore named a Jew as his own running mate.
 
Certainly, Senator Joseph Lieberman cannot be described as being pro-Arab. Nor could we have expected Lieberman to abandon his blind loyalty to Israel had he and Gore won.
 
However, Gore did come out of an American administration that was the most pro-Arab ever in the history of the United States. Outgoing President William Clinton, despite his own personal failings, did all he could to open the door of the White House and his administration to a wide spectrum of often rival Arab and Muslim organizations.
 
Do not expect the president-elect to stop at Powell, who will certainly
reinforce the hard-line Republican driven policies that have sought to
destroy Saddam Hussein at the expense of millions of innocent Arabs in Iraq.
 
We are too often quick to forget those glory days, or the practices of
previous presidents, including former President Bush, who refused to take campaign contributions from Arab Americans suggesting that the money was "tainted."
 
And, surprise, surprise. Who do you think president-elect Bush plans to give a cabinet post?
 
Top on his list to serve as Secretary of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) is the one and only Congressman Rick Lazio. 
 
You remember Lazio, don't you.
 
Lazio is the man who challenged Clinton's wife, Hillary, in the highly
publicized race for New York Senator. It was attacks from Lazio claiming that money from Muslims and Muslim organizations was "tainted."
 
Lazio even described some of the contributors as "Arabs" so
clearly, he was appealing to the anti-Arab and anti-Muslim audiences in New York. Hillary Clinton did return the money to remove the controversy from the news and she was blamed for giving in. But why should she listen to the Arabs and Muslims when they were openly condemning her husband and calling for the election of George W. Bush?
 
Lazio is the choice over Congressman Bill Paxon. Both are from New York. And you can bet that Lazio will be a key player in the Bush administration, maybe the person who will be the first to demand that the new president return tainted Arab money."
 
These are not the actions of a man who is ready to show gratitude to either Muslims or Arabs for having supported his candidacy.
 
But it could be a good lesson in politics for us.

(Ray Hanania is a Palestinian American writer based in Chicago and a regular contributor to MMN. His columns are archived on the web at www.hanania.com)

 
Source:
 
by courtesy & © 2000 Ray Hanania
 
by the same author:
 
 
Copyright © 2000 Media Monitors Network. All rights reserved.  
Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited.
 
 

COMMENTS