Opinion in the "New" America is taking on a new and morally
unethical
role that is sinister in its lack of professionalism.
It used to be that individuals who holding views challenging the
tyranny
of the majority, were simply ignored in a conspiracy of demagoguery
involving
the American government and the majority of the so-called American
"free
press."
Now, those that challenge this hypocrisy face accusations of
"treachery"
and of being "unpatriotic." What little opportunity they had to express
themselves is eroding.
In America, the news media has never been "free." It is "un-free."
The American media is dominated by individuals of hypocrisy who have two
contradictory messages, one that ennobles free speech when it suits
their
beliefs and one that denies it brutally to those who challenge them.
The unfree American media hypocrites continue to stoke the emotions of
the
American people and dance around a bonfire of hysteria, bigotry, and
distortions. This exclusively American system of media hypocrisy
continues to
mutate into an uglier atmosphere of restrictions making a mockery of
democracy that exposes the American news media's double standards to
those
who wish to open their eyes.
Everyday in the sanctimonious American news media, columns upon
columns
express the view supporting the state terrorism of the Israeli
Government of
Ariel Sharon, a man held responsible for some of the worst acts of
butchery
and carnage in the Middle East. The redundancy factor in the American
media's
hypocrisy is so obscene it resembles a killer that continues to stab a
corpse
repeatedly long after life has been taken.
This same news media denies to those who disagree the right to
challenge
these one-sided, often inaccurate views, refusing to allow them to
express
themselves. This is not the result of so-called "Jewish control" of the
news
media, a concept created by Arab World leaders who simply lacked the
intellect to understand the real problem.
It is the result of the purest form of evil politics, a politics that is
so
weak in moral legitimacy that it must deny anyone the right to challenge
its
foundations because its foundations are weak and indefensible. In the
American news media, the most effective way to defend the indefensible
is to
take away the right of those to challenge it.
