|
The real ideological root of terrorism is Darwinism and Materialism
by Harun Yahya
Introduction
Most people think the theory of evolution was first proposed by Charles
Darwin, and rests on scientific evidence, observations and experiments.
However, in the same way that Darwin was not its originator, neither does
the theory rest on scientific proof. The theory consists of an adaptation
to nature of an ancient dogma called materialist philosophy. Although it
is backed up by no scientific evidence, the theory is blindly supported in
the name of materialist philosophy.
This fanaticism has resulted in many of disasters. That is because
together with the spread of Darwinism and the materialist philosophy it
supports, the answer to the question 'What is a human being?' has changed.
People who used to answer: 'Human beings were created by God and have to
live according to the morality He teaches' have now begun to think that
'Man came into being by chance, and is an animal who developed with the
fight for survival.' There is a heavy price to pay for this great
deception. Violent ideologies such as racism, fascism and communism, and
many other cruel world views based on conflict have all drawn strength
from this deception.
This article will examine this disaster Darwinism has brought to the
world and reveal its connection with terrorism, one of the most important
global problems of our time.
The Darwinist Misconception: 'Life is conflict'
Darwin set out with one basic premise when developing his theory: 'The
development of living things depends on the fight for survival. The strong
win the struggle. The weak are condemned to defeat and oblivion.'
According to Darwin, there was a ruthless struggle for survival and
eternal conflict in nature. The strong always overcome the weak, and this
enables development to take place. The subtitle he gave to his book The
Origin of Species, "The Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection
or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life",
encapsulates that view.
Furthermore, Darwin proposed that the 'fight for survival' also applied
between human races. According to that claim, 'favoured races' were
victorious in the struggle. Favoured races, in Darwin's view, were white
Europeans. African or Asian races had lagged behind in the struggle for
survival. Darwin went further, and suggested that these races would soon
lose the 'struggle for survival' entirely, and thus disappear:
At some future period, not very distant as measured
by centuries, the civilised races of man will almost certainly
exterminate, and replace the savage races throughout the world. At the
same time the anthropomorphous apes … will no doubt be exterminated. The
break between man and his nearest allies will then be wider, for it will
intervene between man in a more civilised state, as we may hope, even than
the Caucasian, and some ape as low as a baboon, instead of as now
between the negro or Australian and the gorilla.
[1]
The Indian anthropologist Lalita Vidyarthi explains how Darwin's theory
of evolution imposed racism on the social sciences:
His (Darwin's) theory of the survival of
the fittest was warmly welcomed by the
social scientists of the day, and they believed mankind had achieved
various levels of evolution culminating in the white man's civilization.
By the second half of the nineteenth century racism was accepted as
fact by the vast majority of Western scientists.
[2]
Darwin's Source of Inspiration: Malthus's
Theory of Ruthlessness
Darwin's source of inspiration on this subject was the British
economist Thomas Malthus's book An Essay on the Principle of Population.
Left to their own devices, Malthus calculated that the human population
increased rapidly. In his view, the main influences that kept populations
under control were disasters such as war, famine and disease. In short,
according to this brutal claim, some people had to die for others to live.
Existence came to mean 'permanent war.'
In the 19th century, Malthus's ideas were widely accepted.
European upper class intellectuals in particular supported his cruel
ideas. In an article titled 'The Nazis' Secret Scientific Agenda,'
the importance 19th century attached Europe attached to
Malthus's views on population is described in this way:
In the opening half of the nineteenth century,
throughout Europe, members of the ruling classes gathered to discuss the
newly discovered "Population problem" and to devise ways of implementing
the Malthusian mandate, to increase the mortality rate of the poor: "Instead
of recommending cleanliness to the poor, we should encourage contrary
habits. In our towns we should make the streets narrower, crowd more
people into the houses, and court the return of the plague. In the country
we should build our villages near stagnant pools, and particularly
encourage settlements in all marshy and unwholesome situations," and
so forth and so on.
[3]
As a result of this cruel policy, the weak, and those who lost the
struggle for survival would be eliminated, and as a result the rapid rise
in population would be balanced out. This so-called 'oppression of the
poor' policy was actually carried out in 19th century Britain.
An industrial order was set up in which children of eight and nine were
made to work sixteen hours a day in the coal mines and thousands died from
the terrible conditions. The 'struggle for survival' demanded by Malthus's
theory led to millions of Britons leading lives full of suffering.
Influenced by these ideas, Darwin applied this concept of conflict to
all of nature, and proposed that the strong and the fittest emerged
victorious from this war of existence. Moreover, he claimed that the
so-called struggle for survival was a justified an unchangeable law of
nature. On the other hand, he invited people to abandon their religious
beliefs by denying creation, and thus aimed at all ethical values that
could prove an obstacle to the ruthlessness of the 'struggle for
survival.'
The dissemination of these untrue ideas that led individuals to
ruthlessness and cruelty, cost humanity a heavy price in the 20thcentury.
The Role of Darwinism in Preparing the Ground for World War III
As Darwinism dominated European culture, the effects of the 'struggle
for survival' began to emerge. Colonialist European nations in particular
began to portray the nations they colonized as 'evolutionary backward
nations' and looked to Darwinism for justification.
The bloodiest political effect of Darwinism was the outbreak of World
War I in 1914.
In his book Europe Since 1870, the well-known British professor
of history James Joll explains that one of the factors that prepared the
ground for World War I was the belief in Darwinism of European rulers at
the time. For instance, the Austro-Hungarian chief of staff, Franz Baron
Conrad von Hoetzendorff, wrote in his post-war memoirs:
Philanthropic religions, moral teachings and
philosophical doctrines may certainly sometimes serve to weaken
mankind's struggle for existence in its crudest form, but they will
never succeed in removing it as a driving motive of the world… It is in
accordance with this great principle that the catastrophe of the world war
came about as the result of the motive forces in the lives of states and
peoples, like a thunderstorm which must by its nature discharge itself.
[4]
It is not hard to understand why Conrad, with that ideological
foundation, should have encouraged the Austro-Hungarian Empire to declare
war. Such ideas at the time were not limited to the military. Kurt Riezler,
the personal assistant and confidant of the German chancellor Theobald von
Bethmann-Hollweg, wrote in 1914: 'Eternal and absolute enmity is
fundamentally inherent in relations between peoples; and the hostility
which we observe everywhere… is not the result of a perversion of
human nature but is the essence of the world and the source of life
itself.'
[5]
Friedrich von Bernardi, a World War I general, made a similar
connection between war and the laws of war in nature. "War" declared
Bernhardi "is a biological necessity"; it "is as necessary as the
struggle of the elements of nature"; it "gives a biologically just
decision, since its decisions rest on the very nature of things."
[6]
As we have seen, World War I broke out because of European thinkers,
generals and administrators who saw warfare, bloodshed and suffering as a
kind of 'development,' and thought they were an unchanging 'law of
nature,' The ideological root that dragged all of that generation to
destruction was nothing else than Darwin's concepts of the 'struggle for
survival' and 'favored races.'
World War I left behind it 8 million dead, hundreds of ruined cities,
and millions of wounded, crippled, homeless and unemployed.
The basic cause of World War II, which broke out 21 years later and
left 55 million dead behind it, was also based on Darwinism.
The Fruit of 'The Law of the Jungle': Fascism
As Darwinism fed racism in the 19th century, it formed the
basis of an ideology that would develop and drown the world in blood in
the 20thcentury: Nazism.
A strong Darwinist influence can be seen in Nazi ideologues. When one
examines this theory, which was given shape by Adolf Hitler and Alfred
Rosenberg, one comes across such concepts as 'natural selection,'
'selected mating,' and 'the struggle for survival between the races,'
which are repeated dozens of time in The Origin of Species. When
calling his book Mein Kampf (My Struggle), Hitler was inspired by
the Darwinist struggle for survival and the principle that victory went to
the fittest. He particularly talks about the struggle between the races:
'History would culminate in a new millennial empire
of unparalleled splendor, based on a new racial hierarchy ordained by
nature herself.'[7]
In the 1933 Nuremberg party rally, Hitler proclaimed that "a higher
race subjects to itself a lower race… a right which we see in nature
and which can be regarded as the sole conceivable right".
That the Nazis were influenced by Darwinism is a fact that many
historians accept. The historian Hickman describes Darwinism's influence
on Hitler as follows:
(Hitler) was a firm believer and preacher of
evolution. Whatever the deeper, profound, complexities of his psychosis,
it is certain that [the concept of struggle was important because] … his
book, Mein Kampf, clearly set forth a number of evolutionary
ideas, particularly those emphasizing struggle, survival of the fittest
and the extermination of the weak to produce a better society.
[8]
Hitler, who emerged with these views, dragged the world to violence
that had never before been seen. Many ethnic and political groups, and
especially the Jews, were exposed to terrible cruelty and slaughter in the
Nazi concentration camps. World War II, which began with the Nazi
invasion, cost 55 million lives. What lay behind the greatest tragedy in
world history was Darwinism's concept of the 'struggle for survival.'
The Bloody Alliance: Darwinism and
Communism
While fascists are found on the right wing of Social Darwinism, the
left wing is occupied by communists. Communists have always been among the
fiercest defenders of Darwin's theory.
This relationship between Darwinism and communism goes right back to
the founders of both these 'isms.' Marx and Engels, the founders of
communism, read Darwin's The Origin of Species as soon as it came
out, and were amazed at is 'dialectical materialist' attitude. The
correspondence between Marx and Engels showed that they saw Darwin's
theory as 'containing the basis in natural history for communism.' In his
book The Dialectics of Nature, which he wrote under the influence
of Darwin, Engels was full of praise for Darwin, and tried to make his own
contribution to the theory in the chapter 'The Part Played by Labour in
the Transition from Ape to Man.'
Russian communists who followed in the footsteps of Marx and Engels,
such as Plekhanov, Lenin, Trotsky and Stalin, all agreed with Darwin's
theory of evolution. Plekhanov, who is considered as the founder of
Russian communism, regarded marxism as 'Darwinism in its application to
social science'.
[9]
Trotsky said, 'Darwin's discovery is the highest triumph of the
dialectic in the whole field of organic matter.'
[10]
'Darwinist education' had a major role in the formation of communist
cadres. For instance, historians note the fact that Stalin was
religious in his youth, but became an atheist because of Darwin's books.
[11]
Mao, who established communist rule in China and killed millions of
people, openly stated that 'Chinese socialism is founded upon Darwin
and the theory of evolution.'
[12]
The Harvard University historian James Reeve Pusey goes into great
detail regarding Darwinism's effect on Mao and Chinese communism in his
research book China and Charles Darwin.
[13]
In short, there is an unbreakable link between the theory of evolution
and communism. The theory claims that living things are the product of
blind chance, and provides a so-called scientific support for atheism.
Communism, an atheist ideology, is for that reason firmly tied to
Darwinism. Moreover, the theory of evolution proposes that development in
nature is possible thanks to conflict (in other words 'the struggle for
survival') and supports the concept of 'dialectics' which is fundamental
to communism.
If we think of the communist concept of 'dialectical conflict,' which
killed some 120 million people throughout the 20thcentury, as a
'killing machine' then we can better understand the dimension of the
disaster that Darwinism visited on our planet.
Darwinism and Terrorism
As we have so far seen, Darwinism is at the root of various ideologies
of violence that spelled disaster to mankind in the 20thcentury.
However, as well as these ideologies, Darwinism also defines an 'ethical
understanding' and 'method' that could influence various world views. The
fundamental concept behind this understanding and method is 'fighting
those who are not one of us.'
We can explain this in the following way: There are different beliefs,
worldviews and philosophies in the world. These can look at each other in
one of two ways:
1) They can respect the existence of those who are not one of them and
try to establish dialogue with them, employing a humane method.
2) They can choose to fight others, and to try to secure an advantage
by damaging them, in other words, behave like a wild animal.
The horror we call terrorism is nothing other than a statement of the
second view.
When we consider the difference between these two approaches, we can
see that the idea of "man as a fighting animal" which Darwinism has
subconsciously imposed on people is particularly influential. Individuals
and groups who choose the way of conflict may never have heard of
Darwinism and the principles of that ideology. But in the final analysis,
they agree with a view whose philosophical basis rests on Darwinism. What
leads them to believe in the rightness of violence is such Darwinism-based
slogans as;
'In this world, only the strong survive,'
'Big fish swallow the little ones,'
'War is a virtue,'
and 'Man advances by waging war.'
Take Darwinism away, and these are nothing but empty slogans.
Actually, when Darwinism is taken away, no philosophy of 'conflict'
remains. The three monotheistic religions that most people in the
world believe in, Islam, Christianity and Judaism, all oppose violence.
All three religions wish to bring peace and harmony to the world, and
oppose innocent people being killed and suffering cruelty and torture.
Conflict and violence violate the morality that God has set out for man,
and are abnormal and undesired concepts. However, Darwinism sees and
portrays conflict and violence as natural, justified and correct concepts
that have to exist.
For this reason, if some people commit terrorism using the concepts and
symbols of Islam, Christianity and Judaism in the name of those religions,
you can be sure that those people are not Muslims, Christians or Jews.
They are in fact Social Darwinists. They hide under a cloak of religion,
but they are not genuine believers. Even if they claim to be serving
religion, they are actually enemies of religion and believers. That is
because they are ruthlessly committing a crime that religion forbids, and
in such a way as to blacken religion in peoples' eyes.
For this reason, the root of the terrorism that plagues our world is
not in any of the monotheistic religions, but is in atheism, and the
expression of atheism in our times: 'Darwinism' and 'materialism.'
Note:
[2] Lalita Prasad Vidyarthi, Racism,
Science and Pseudo-Science, Unesco, France, Vendôme, 1983. s. 54
[4] James Joll,
"Europe Since 1870: An
International History", Penguin Books, Middlesex, 1990, s. 164
[6] M.F. Ashley-Montagu, Man in Process (New York: World. Pub. Co.
1961) pp. 76, 77 cited in Bolton Davidheiser, W E Lammers (ed)
Scientific Studies in Special Creationism, 1971, p. 338-339
[7]
L.H. Gann, "Adolf Hitler, The Complete
Totalitarian", The Intercollegiate Review, Fall 1985, p. 24; cited in
Henry M. Morris, "The Long war Against God", Baker Book House, 1989, p.
78
[8]
Hickman, R., Biocreation, Science
Press, Worthington, OH, pp. 51-52, 1983; Jerry Bergman,
"Darwinism and the Nazi Race Holocaust,"
Creation Ex Nihilo Technical Journal
13 (2): 101-111, 1999
[9]
Robert M. Young DARWINIAN EVOLUTION AND
HUMAN HISTORY, Historical Studies on Science and Belief, 1980
[10] Alan Woods and Ted Grant. "Marxism and
Darwinism," Reason in Revolt: Marxism and
Modern Science, London, 1993
[11]
Alex de Jonge, "Stalin and The Shaping
of the Soviet Union", William Collins Sons & Limited Co., Glasgow,
1987, s. 22
[12] Mehnert, Kampf um Mao's Erbe, Deutsche Verlags-Anstalt, 1977
[13] James Reeve Pusey,
"China and Charles
Darwin", Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1983
Harun Yahya
is a prominent Turkish intellectual.
Related
Article (s):
Buy the
related book (s) now:
Please, Visit Harun Yahya's Complete
Catalogue
Source:
|
