|
|

|
Distinguishing between Zionism and Judaism
by Harun Yahya
In the summer of 1982 there began a great
savagery that caused the whole world to cry out in protest. The Israeli
Army entered Lebanon in a sudden attack, and moved forward destroying
every target that appeared before it. The Israelis surrounded the refugee
camps, where Palestinians lived who had fled the Israeli occupation years
before, and for two days used Lebanese Christian militias to slaughter
innocent civilians. Within a few days, thousands of innocent people had
been massacred.
This terrible Israeli terrorism outraged
the whole world. The interesting thing, however, is that some of the
protests came from Jews, even Israeli Jews. Professor Benjamin Cohen of
Tel Aviv University penned a statement on June 6, 1982, saying:
I am writing to you while listening to
a transistor that has just announced that 'we' are in the process of
'realizing our objectives' in Lebanon: to insure 'peace' for the
residents of Galilee. These lies worthy of Goebbels make me mad. It is
clear that this savage war, more barbaric than any of those preceding
it, has nothing to do with the attempt in London or the security of
Galilee ... Jews, sons of Abraham ... Jews, victims themselves of so
much cruelty, how can they become so cruel? ... The greatest success
of Zionism is the 'dejudaisation' of the Jews.
Benjamin Cohen was not the only Israeli to
oppose the Israeli occupation of Lebanon. Many Jewish intellectuals living
in Israel condemned the savagery carried out by their own state.
This attitude was not restricted to the
occupation of Lebanon. Israel’s oppression of the Palestinians, its
insistence on its policy of occupation, and its links with the
semi-fascist administrations in the former racist regime in South Africa
had been criticized for many years by many prominent intellectuals in
Israel. This Jewish criticism was aimed not just at the policies of
Israel, but also at Zionism, its official ideology.
This situation is the expression of a very
important truth: Israel’s policy of occupation and state terrorism from
1967 up to the present stems from the ideology of Zionism, and many Jews
in the world are opposed to it.
For Muslims, therefore, the concepts that
should be criticized are not Judaism or the Jewish race, but Zionism. In
the same way that an anti-Nazi can have no hatred for the German people,
so he can have none for the Jewish race because he opposes Zionism.
The Racist Roots of Zionism
After the Jews were expelled from Jerusalem
in 70 AD, they began to spread to different parts of the world. During
this period of the ‘Diaspora,’ which lasted up to the 19th
century, the vast majority of Jews saw themselves as a religious group.
Over time, most Jews adopted the religion of the countries they lived in.
Hebrew was left as a sacred language used in prayers and religious texts.
Jews in Germany began to speak German, and those in Britain, English. When
certain social restrictions on Jews in European countries were lifted in
the 19th century, Jews began to assimilate with the societies
they were living in. Most Jews saw themselves as a ‘religious community,’
not as a ‘race’ or ‘nation.’ They described themselves as ‘Jewish
Germans,’ ‘Jewish Britons,’ or ‘Jewish Americans.’
As we know, however, there was a huge rise
in racism in the 19th century. Racist ideas, influenced in
particular by Darwin’s theory of evolution, grew enormously and found many
supporters in Western societies. Zionism was the effect this racist storm
had among the Jews.
The Jews who propagated the idea of Zionism
were people with very weak religious beliefs. They saw Judaism as the name
of a race, not as a community of belief. They suggested that the Jews were
a separate race from European nations, that it was impossible for them to
live together and that it was essential they establish their own homeland.
They did not rely on religious thinking when deciding where that homeland
should be. Theodor Herzl, the founder of Zionism, once thought of Uganda,
and this became known as the ‘Uganda Plan.’ The Zionists later decided on
Palestine. The reason for this was Palestine was regarded as ‘the Jews’
historic homeland’ rather than for any religious significance it had for
them.
The Zionists made great efforts to get
other Jews to accept these non-religious ideas. The World Zionist
Organization that was set up undertook vast propaganda work in almost
countries with Jewish populations, and began to suggest that Jews could
not live peacefully with other nations and that they were a separate
‘race,’ for which reason they had to go and settle in Palestine. Most
Jewish communities ignored these calls.
In this way, Zionism entered world politics
as a racist ideology which maintained that Jews should not live with other
nations. First of all, this mistaken idea created grave problems for and
pressure on Jews living in the diaspora. Then for Muslims in the Middle
East, it brought the Israeli policy of occupation and annexation, together
with bloodshed, death, poverty and terror.
Many Jews today criticize the ideology of
Zionism. Rabbi Hirsch, one of the foremost Jewish men of religion, said,
‘Zionism wants to define the Jewish people as a
national entity... which is a heresy.’
The famous French Muslim thinker Roger
Garaudy wrote this on the subject:
The worst enemy of the prophetic Jewish
faith is the nationalist, racist and colonialist logic of tribal
Zionism, born of the nationalism, racism and colonialism of 19th
century Europe. This logic, which inspired all the colonialisms of the
West and all its wars of one nationalism against another, is a
suicidal logic. There is no future or security for Israel and no peace
in the Middle East unless Israel becomes "dezionized" and returns to
the faith of Abraham, which is the spiritual, fraternal and common
heritage of the three revealed religions: Judaism, Christianity and
Islam.
For this reason, therefore, we must
distinguish between Judaism and Zionism. Not every Jew in the world is a
Zionist. True Zionists are a minority in the Jewish world. Moreover, there
are a great many Jews who oppose Zionism’s crimes against humanity, who
want Israel to withdraw at once from all the territory it has occupied,
and say that instead of being a racist ‘Jewish state’ Israel should be a
free state where all races and communities can live together in equality.
While Muslims rightfully oppose Israel and
Zionism, they must also bear these truths in mind, and remember that it is
not the Jews who are the problem, but Zionism.
Notes:
"Professor Leibowitz calls Israeli politics in Lebanon Judeo-Nazi"
Yediot Aharonoth, July 2, 1982
Washington Post, October 3, 1978
Roger Garaudy, "Right to Reply: Reply to the Media Lynching of Abbe
Pierre and Roger Garaudy", Samizdat, June 1996
Harun Yahya
is a prominent Turkish intellectual.
Buy the
relevant / Harun
Yahya's book (s) now:
|