by Helena Bestakova
The North Atlantic Council (NAC), the
decision-making body of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization
(NATO), on August 21 authorized the deployment of 3,500 allied
troops to Macedonia to collect weapons from ethnic Albanian
militants. The decision gave a green light to US Air Force General
Joseph Ralston, NATO’s supreme commander in Europe, to launch the
full mission, led by Britain, within ten days to two weeks. An
advance party of some 400 British, French and Czech troops had
already been placed in accordance with an earlier ruling to send
troops to gauge the stability of an existing ceasefire and establish
contact with members of the Albanian leaders and Macedonian security
forces. NATO has insisted all along that the operation, codenamed
"Operation Essential Harvest," will not go ahead unless the
ceasefire holds.
The mission is composed of about 1,800 British
troops and another 1,700 drawn from 10 other European countries and
the United States. The troops will establish sites for collecting
rebel arms. The weapons will be taken to Greece and destroyed.
Once the entire force is in place, the clock
will start ticking on NATO’s self-imposed 30-day deadline for the
mission. NATO officials are adamant that Operation Essential Harvest
will last no longer than the 30 days. Many observers doubt that the
mission will be able to fulfill its objective so soon.
The administration of US president Bush is
poised to play a behind-the-scenes role in Macedonia. For instance,
no new US troops will be deployed in the Balkans as part of the NATO
mission. But American troops already in Macedonia, Kosova and
Bosnia-Herzegovina will help with monitoring the ceasefire and
reconnaissance.
Washington will also fund a campaign to shore
up public support for the peace accord. The US will spend up to
$250,000 on advertisements and direct mailings to every household in
the country. The International Republican Institute (IRI), a
Washington-based thinktank that is partially funded by the US
government, has already been commissioned to conduct a public
opinion survey whose results will be used to design "public service
announcements." The IRI took an active part in the media campaign
that helped defeat Slobodan Milosevic in Yugoslavia’s presidential
elections last year.
Under an agreement signed in a low-key
ceremony on August 13 by Macedonia’s four main political parties,
the Albanian minority will be given greater political and cultural
rights and the NLA will disarm. In return the Albanians are obliged
to recognize the inviolability of Macedonia, eschewing any
aspirations for independence or ideas for a "Greater Albania." The
time and place of the signing ceremony were kept secret until the
last minute because of fear of a backlash from the Slavic public.
The NLA endorsed the draft document even though it had been excluded
from the political process at the insistence of the Macedonian
government.
The accord calls for amending the preamble to
the Macedonian constitution to delete reference to Macedonian Slavs
as the only "constitutional" people and to make the county a civic
society of all its ethnic groups. The 1991 constitution says that
the country was founded by the Macedonian people and lists
Albanians, Turks, Vlachs, Romas and others only as minorities.
Another constitutional amendment will state that the Orthodox Church
and other religions are separate from the state and equal before the
law. The document also creates a "double majority" system in
parliament, requiring that half the lawmakers voting on legislation
affecting the status or cultural life of minorities must come from
one or more minority groups in order for it to be passed.
The agreement further elevates the status of
Albanian to a second official language in areas where Albanians
comprise at least 20 percent of the population. Albanian will also
come into official use in parliamentary sessions and committees, as
well as in communications between ethnic Albanian citizens and
government bureaucracies. However, Slavic Macedonian will remain the
sole language of central government and in foreign relations. The
agreement further provides for state-funded higher education in the
Albanian language in communities where ethnic Albanians comprise
more than 20 percent of the population. In the past, the state gave
funding only to lower education in Albanian.
The accord requires that more Albanians be
recruited into the police force and that Albanian police be assigned
to work in communities with majority Albanian populations. An
additional 1,000 ethnic Albanians will be hired as police officers
in two stages in 2002 and 2003. That will raise the number of
Albanians in the 6,000-strong police force to 23 percent, from their
current proportion of 3 percent. The agreement requires the approval
of local political leaders in predominantly Albanian areas for
police chiefs nominated by the government to serve in those areas.
An annex to the accord provides for the
disarmament of NLA fighters. Another annex provides an amnesty for
NLA fighters who voluntarily turn in their weapons, provided that
they have not been involved in "war crimes." It is not clear who
determines whether fighters have been involved in "war crimes," nor
is there a provision for trying Macedonian military or paramilitary
personnel involved in such crimes. This is a serious oversight, as
government troops have been involved in atrocities against ethnic
Albanians. For instance, on August 12 troops rampaged through the
village of Ljuboten, near Skopje, killing at least nine civilians.
Ljuboten villagers accused government troops of summarily executing
the civilians, whose bodies remained scattered on the streets for
two days. The Ljuboten massacre was in retaliation for a landmine
attack that had killed eight soldiers two days earlier.
But scepticism remains about whether the
accord will succeed in bringing peace to the country. Sporadic
fighting has underlined the fragility of the truce. The ceasefire
has been violated almost daily, with Albanians and security forces
fighting gun-battles in villages in the northern and northwestern
parts of the country.
Another sign of the fragility of the peace
process is that the agreement envisages a disarmament process
combined with legislation enshrining constitutional reforms required
to boost the Albanian minority’s rights. The legislators are
supposed to act on the agreement within 45 days of its signing.
There is mounting suspicion that extremist Slav nationalists in
parliament will obstruct the legislation required to implement the
deal. The hard-line nationalist speaker of the Macedonian parliament
has already indicated that he will not put the required amendments
forward for ratification until the NLA is completely disarmed and
dissolved.
Moreover, there is no agreement on how many
arms the NLA fighters possess. Initial estimates put the NLA arsenal
at 8,000 weapons. The NLA claims to have only 2,000; the Macedonian
estimate is about 85,000 weapons, not counting individual rounds of
ammunition. It is almost certain that the NLA, with reasonable fears
of army and police reprisals despite the promised amnesty, will be
reluctant to turn in more than a token quantity of arms and
ammunition.
Opposition to the agreement looms large
everyone. The accord will test the NLA chain of command. There are
reports of an emerging "warlord syndrome": small offshoots,
comprised mainly of nationalists opposed to any peace agreement,
have been splintering from the NLA. The existence of such splinter
groups would complicate NATO’s weapons-collection mission. On August
18, Major General Gunnar Lange, the NATO mission’s top military
commander, told a news conference that the alliance will concentrate
on collecting weapons only from the NLA. "The disarmament of those
splinter groups is not part of this mission," he said. "We are not
going to disarm any organizations which are not under the control of
the so-called NLA."
Officially, the NLA denies that these groups
even exist. The most prominent of these is the Albanian National
Army (ANA), a shadowy Marxist-Leninist group that has sworn to fight
on for a "Greater Albania" in the Balkans. The ANA earlier claimed
responsibility for an ambush near Tetovo that killed 10 Macedonian
soldiers, and for another attack in southern Serbia in which 2
Serbian police officers were killed. One ANA communiqué, signed by
"Major General Eagle of Sar," rejected the accord, saying: "The ANA
will be the leader and the standard-bearer of the fight for national
liberation. Agreements signed treacherously or under international
pressure like this – are temporary and invalid."
Emotions among the Slavic Macedonian
community, whipped into fever-pitch by hard-line politicians and the
mostly extremist nationalist media, seem to have been hovering on
the verge of collective frenzy. Conspiracy theories abound such as
that the agreement is part of a Western plot to break Macedonia up.
There have also been reports of Slavic Macedonians destroying their
own houses before evacuating villages in the face of NLA advances,
apparently with the intention of blaming the Albanians for their
destruction. On August 18, Slavic Macedonians blocked the main road
in the village of Stenkovac, briefly preventing NATO-led
peacekeepers from travelling between Macedonia, where their support
base is located, and Kosova. Curiously, it was protesters belonging
to the World Macedonian Congress, an international non-governmental
group representing Macedonian immigrants abroad, who erected the
blockade. This highlighted the fact that Macedonian scepticism about
the accord is not merely local.
Above all, anti-Albanian feeling and hatred at
the heart of the conflict seem resistant to change. When Arben
Xhaferi, leader of the Democratic Albanian Party, addressed
reporters in Albanian at the signing ceremony, a visibly irritated
prime minister Ljubco Georgievski walked out. President Boris
Trajkovski, a "moderate," demanded a public apology from Xhaferi and
accused the Albanian leader of scoring points by "provocation."
The question is whether peace really has a
chance in such an environment, in which paranoid and monolithic
nationalism thrives on denial and effacement of the "others", "the
outsiders", "the ones who do not belong", the ones who do not "fit
in."