Peace Conference as a Cover for Sharon's War Crimes
by Hichem Karoui
I am appalled at the
perspective that Mr.Powell might be wasting time and
losing an opportunity to make himself useful for the
purpose of peace. We all know what the Secretary of
State did since he left Washington, who he met with
in Morocco, in Spain, in Cairo, in Jerusalem, and in
Ramallah. We heard him talking to the reporters after
each meeting, and between the meetings. These are
hard times for him, indeed. But it is in such times
that another "star" of the American diplomacy earned
world fame and much a disputed glory. I mean H.
Kissinger, who might be relishing right at this very
moment the unbelievable stumbling of his remote
successor over the obstacles he had himself widely
contributed to creating and anchoring in the Middle
East quagmire. Would anyone pretend that this is
another stage or another period or another
administration? OK. Yet, just observe that the region
is still the same, with the same problems, and the
same causes. Kissinger has gone away, but the
arrangements he made, though they are still tying the
Arabs’ hands as it seems, did not make the Israelis
any more thoughtful in respect of their commitments.
Mr. Bush recently said that Yasir Arafat has only to
blame himself for what happened to him! Did that mean
he should regret all the steps he made towards the
Israelis, Oslo included? For if Arafat has listened
to those who criticized Oslo, he would never have
found himself thus trapped into his own compound at
Ramallah. And he would certainly never have heard a
Secretary of State adopting so shamelessly the
position of a war criminal, and calling for an
International Peace Conference, without the Chairman
of the PLO! An International Conference for what?
Peace? So, Sharon is now for peace? Just after
burying hundreds of corpses in the common graves?
Peace Conference to cover up the repeated massacre of
Sabra and Shatila in the West Bank?
Just what happened in Jenin? What do
Mr.Powell and his boss in Washington think of that? They could not
ignore what the Israelis did, since even some Israeli papers have –
indirectly- acknowledged it? For if we believe Haaretz (April 13):
"The High Court ordered the Israel Defense Forces not to remove the
bodies of Palestinians killed in fighting in the Jenin refugee camp
until a hearing is held on the matter. The decision came in response
to a petition presented by attorney Jamil Dakaur
from the "Adala" organization (…) The Court also ordered the
State Prosecutor to respond to charges that the IDF buried the
bodies in a huge mass grave, as Palestinian sources claimed Thursday, and if so, why."
Mr. Powell could not ignore what happened, for his
spokesman, Richard Boucher was asked about it in Jerusalem on April
13:
"QUESTION: Did
the Palestinians tell you that they wanted to see a statement - a strong statement from the Secretary about
the humanitarian situation?
MR. BOUCHER: The Secretary had already made
strong statements about the humanitarian
situation. (Cross talk). We mentioned the situation in Jenin last night in our statement, we were concerned
about it. We mentioned it again this
morning in the statement after the UN meeting, we met with the UN representatives because we are concerned about
it, and in fact they are as well, that's
one of their responsibilities to take care of people in that camp. And that was one of the things that
they talked about quite a bit."
Mr. Boucher repeated twice the
word "concerned" in this sentence; but he did not explain in what
consist that concern? How does it show itself on the ground? Is it
in helping Sharon clean his hands from the Palestinian blood and
propagating unscrupulously his immoral call for an International
Conference without the PLO leader? Then if the American officials
are really concerned, why did we not hear anything about their
pressure on Sharon? We know Powell’s conditions to meet Arafat: the
latter had to condemn the suicide bombing, which he did. And when he
met him, Powell asked him for a cease-fire!!! A cease-fire from
the besieged! No joke! This is really something new in the
records of military strategy and world diplomacy! I suggest that
this situation (i.e. asking the besieged for a cease-fire) be added
as a lesson of strategy and diplomacy to the American manuals! Maybe
it would help the future generals and would-be-diplomat to be as
cogent as Mr.Powell!
But forget about this. What did the
Secretary of State say to Sharon when his tanks were still firing at
the Palestinian homes? Has he traveled so far just to tell us that
he was unable to hinder Sharon from doing more harm? Then, if
America, with all its means, is powerless, why should Mr. Bush blame
Arafat for being helpless? What means did Bush give Arafat to
implement cease-fire, which have been rejected by the latter? After
all the destruction Sharon has achieved in the Palestinian
territories, police and security forces’ compounds included, who
will help Arafat to implement a cease-fire that has been – that is
still – continually violated by the mere fact of the Israeli
occupation?