Muslims in America have been in a state of siege and it
seems to be getting worse rather than better. Increasing numbers of
Americans have negative views of Islam
and increasing numbers of Muslims are experiencing harassment
or worse.
Much of the blame for this has to lie with the Bush Administration and its
"war on terrorism". Not only do policies such as the Patriot Act,
round-ups and detentions of Muslim immigrants, and over-hyped arrests of
"sleeper cells" damage those Muslims caught up in them, these policies
also create a sense for Americans that Muslims are aliens, enemies within.
The Bush Administration's foreign policies have also
negatively affected Muslims. First and foremost are the wars on
Afghanistan and Iraq. The United States has also given unreserved support
to Israel, Russia, and India in their campaigns against the Palestinians,
the Chechens, and the Kashmiris, respectively, all in the name of the "war
on terrorism". Despite reassurances to the contrary by Bush and others, it
seems that the war on terrorism does not extend beyond Muslim targets.
None of what I've said so far should be news to anybody.
We all know it and despair over it. We wonder if there's anything we can
do to stop it or to change it. The good news is, there is something that
we can do as Muslims in America. That something is to vote.
But wait! Isn't voting haram? Doesn't it mean
supporting a kufr system? Muslims who seek to become politically
active will hear this one a lot. So let's deal with it head on. Shaykh
Muhammad al-Munajjid, a very conservative Saudi scholar, was asked about
voting in elections in a non-Muslim country.
He replied:
It may be the case that the interests of Islam require
Muslims to vote so as to ward off the greater evil and to reduce harmful
effects, such as where two candidates may be non-Muslims but one of them
is less hostile towards Muslims than the other, and Muslims’ votes will
have an impact on the outcome of the election. In such cases there is
nothing wrong with Muslims casting their votes in favour of the less evil
candidate.
America is a democracy. Bush can be voted out and another
president elected in his place. That other president may be someone who
will bring benefit to Muslims. Or he may just be somebody who will do less
harm to Muslims. In either case, by voting for this other president we
will have done something to help the umma, even if it is a small
thing. That is exactly what Shakyh Munajjid is talking about. Bringing
benefit to the umma and reducing harm.
The election is still over a year away, so why am I
writing this now? Because we have an even greater opportunity than just
voting Bush out of office. We can also help select who his opponent will
be on Election Day 2004. There are nine Democratic candidates for
President. We can examine each of them and give our support to the one we
feel will bring the most benefit or do the least harm to Muslims.
That brings me to the topic that forms the title of this
article: why Muslims should support Dennis Kucinich for president. You
probably haven't heard of Dennis Kucinich. The media are ignoring his
campaign. They probably wish he would just go away. What he's saying isn't
popular with those in power. So let me tell you a little bit about Dennis
Kucinich.
Dennis Kucinich is the only one of the Democratic
candidates who voted against the Patriot Act. He has promised that as
president he will repeal it. As a member of Congress, he will be
introducing legislation in September to start rolling it back.
Dennis Kucinich is also the most vocal opponent of the
Iraq war among the Democratic candidates. He first began speaking against
it in July 2002. He mobilized 126 Democrats in the House of
Representatives to vote against the use of force authorization. He marched
in the antiwar rally on February 15. He continues to call for U.S.
withdrawal from Iraq. He
is also pursuing the Bush Administration vigorously about the false and
misleading claims it made to promote the war.
Dennis Kucinich also opposes Israel's occupation of the
West Bank and Gaza. He believes there can be no peace in the Middle East
without justice for the Palestinians. He has even taken part in a teach-in
to his fellow members of Congress to counteract the influence of AIPAC,
the pro-Occupation lobbying group. He
is the only one of the Democratic candidates to hold this view.
A Kucinich presidency would be a great change for the
better for Muslims in America, and even for Muslims abroad. No, he isn't
perfect. His views on social issues are more liberal than the views of
most Muslims. But I think that the benefit he can bring greatly outweighs
any harm. And we are going to face that problem with any Democratic
candidate, without getting as much benefit.
If we want to see Dennis Kucinich as the Democratic
candidate for President in 2004, we have to start supporting him now.
Speaking up for him in our communities and convincing people to vote for
him in the primary elections. Giving our time, efforts, and money to his
campaign. It's a big commitment and it means more involvement with the
American political process than some Muslims may be comfortable with.
This is a decision each of us must make for ourselves.
What is the harm if we act, and what is the harm if we don't act? What is
the course of action that will bring the greatest benefit to Muslims and
is it worth the price?
I sincerely believe that Dennis Kucinich can help the
umma if he is elected president. He may not be in the end. But I don't
want to look back and say "if only I had spoken up, he might have been."
Notes:
http://pewforum.org/publications/surveys/religion-politics.pdf
http://www.cair-net.org/downloads/crr2003-Sample.doc
http://www.villagevoice.com/issues/0328/pyne.php
http://63.175.194.25/index.php?cs=prn&ln=eng&QR=3062
&dgn=3&dgn=2
http://www.kucinich.us/issues/issue_10key.htm
http://www.kucinich.us/issues/issue_iraq.htm
http://www.tikkun.org/index.cfm/action/current/article/173.html
The writer is