An apology is saying you’re sorry, "apologia" or "apologist"
denotes vindication of your position.
Both words come from the same Greek root. The clear-thinking Greeks
were apparently astute enough to remember to defend their own merits,
and not wallow in remorse.
[i]
Amid the condolences, it is gratifying to hear our media proclaim
that "Islam is a religion of peace". I only hope this new-found
reverence is not a prop to influence Muslims into supine acceptance of
a fresh American onslaught?
The Koran warns Muslims that the Jews, Christians, and unbelievers
will never rest until you accept their ways. Granted that there is a
great commonality of ideals in the three faiths of the
Judeo-Christian-Islamic continuum. But billions of people around the
world - pious Muslims and Christians in the Middle East, Asia’s
Buddhists and Confucians, Euro-centrists with sophisticated palates,
and even the odd American - are sick of the vulgar, post-Christian
"cultural" offensive America has imposed world-wide.
The world well knows that America has been on the offensive for
over a century. It is not particularly convenient to voice this fact.
America can be generous to her protégés, and make life miserable and
short for the independent-minded. Her hegemony often does seem to be
the lesser of two evils, and explanations are lost on her anyway. Yet
there is a time for tactful silence, and a time for
straightforwardness.
The pious declarations on every side that "This is not a war
between the ‘West’ and Islam" bespeak fear, not clear ecumenical
vision. In truth, that great struggle never really stopped since the
time of Mohamed, as we can see on a simple historical time-line:
The expansion of Islam, followed by: the Crusades - Christendom
supporting the genocidal Mongols against the Islamic world - The
Spanish Inquisition - Russia’s march southwards - colonialism - Arab
support for the Allies in both World Wars, against their Turkish
Muslim brothers, ‘rewarded’ by the partition of Palestine - Suez -
Israel’s 1967 attack and ongoing encroachments since - Iran crisis -
Egypt bought out at Camp David - the swindle at Oslo - mass
destruction of Iraq and Afghanistan - non-stop media junk-food jihad.
After 1,000 years of getting stomped on as the West’s doormat, a
band of extreme Muslims strike back, and moderate Muslims go on the
defensive, too shaken up even to point out that they are permanently
on the receiving end of a world war.
The attacks were retaliations against this endless abuse, and the
cardinal blame lies at the doors they struck.
[ii] If the
attackers were really as inhuman as America’s foreign policy clique,
they would not have hit targets like embassies, the WTC and the
Pentagon. These are all strategic imperial symbols.
Instead, they would have tried, say, what America did in Iraq:
poisoning our water supply, or in the Sudan: demolishing our
pharmaceutical industry, or to Palestine: shelling our ambulances, or
to the Axis: fire-storming neighborhoods.
Muslim governments should not shrink from telling the superpower
why attacks against it are becoming more popular, that it is time to
resolve these issues, that we only add fuel to the flames trying to
combat them by demonizing and bombarding militants and their
supporters, by espousing a new law of the jungle, extraterritorial
extra-judicial assassinations.
Muslims have to communicate, politely but clearly. Speak up for
yourself, Americans expect it and respect it. Excessive humility looks
suspicious to them, not least from supposedly sly and devious
Easterners.
In the branch of the social sciences called strategic studies,
lesson one is that warfare is an extreme mode of communication that
kicks in when other channels fail. Beasts bite when baring the teeth
doesn’t help. Those who never show their teeth at all may be the first
to get eaten. Those who have at least the wit to squeak or speak up
have a chance to be spared.
In the Near Eastern Social Sciences Department, after all, the US
of A is not a quick study, gifted with the sensitive ears of a Horton
Hears the Who.
Muslims owe the insular inhabitants of hapless America a clear,
insistently repetitive exposition of the grievances that foster
resentment and militancy in the Islamic world. They should not shrink
from reminding anyone, either, by the way, that terrorist, guerrilla,
freedom fighter and patriot are all the same species in scientific
nomenclature, differing only in the colloquial between defenders and
attackers of the status quo.
If Muslims don’t air their myriad grievances now, when they have
finally got some airtime, the Islamic world is set to sustain further
deep, inflamed wounds. If moderate Muslims fail to unleash their
renowned Arab facility for words, the extremists will be sending their
own missives. With the causes hidden iceberg-like, we are all
"cruising for a bruising."
Indeed, Muslims have a duty in the Koran and to the world to set
the record straight. Praying for peace alone is not enough.
Note:
[i] As a British
commentator confided in the Guardian (http://www.guardian.co.uk/Archive/Article/0,4273,4259187,00.html),
"One can feel pity for the victims, and at the same time see that the
US also "might benefit from an insight into what it feels like to be
knocked to your knees by a faceless power, deaf to everything but the
logic of its own crazed agenda." (Charlotte Raven in "A bully with a
bloody nose is still a bully")
[ii] See also John
Pilger in "Islamic peoples are already victims of US power".
"Far from being the terrorists of the world, the Islamic peoples have
been its victims - principally the victims of US fundamentalism."