|
|
|
Israel's War For Terrorism
by Ran HaCohen
It is high time to
reiterate the favourite media question – "Is Arafat Unable, or
Rather Unwilling to Stop Terrorism" – but with a different
protagonist. Prime Minister Sharon has now been in office for about
15 months. He has been enjoying total and unprecedented freedom,
both nationally and internationally, to fight Palestinian terrorism
however he likes, using all measures at hand and blatantly ignoring
all moral and legal considerations. In spite of that, Palestinian
terrorism is alive and killing.
So is Sharon unable – or
rather unwilling to stop terrorism? Last week's events in Gaza irrefutably
prove that the Israeli leader is not only unwilling to see Palestinian
terrorism stopped; Sharon would also do anything to ensure and encourage
terrorism against his own people.
The Gaza Massacre
All experts unanimously agree:
terrorism cannot be stopped by military means alone. Politics and
diplomacy are essential, both bilaterally and on the Palestinian side.
Even devoted supporters of the Israeli occupation admit that a "political
horizon" is necessary. The term is revealing: "horizon" is the place you
never get to, and that's the most generous offer made to the Palestinians:
a "horizon" never to be reached, a "vision" never to be realised. In
short, the very goods that Shimon Peres has been selling so efficiently to
the Palestinians and to the world over the past decade. Israel's Foreign
Minister indeed met with Palestinian officials in the last weeks, in what
was described as the most serious talks between the sides for many months.
Much more importantly,
reliable reports say that, on the 22nd of July, "the heads of Tanzim,
convened at Jenin, approved the text of a communique calling unilaterally
for an end to fighting by Tanzim, Hamas and Islamic Jihad. A few hours
before, Muhammad Dahlan [influential former head of Palestinian Security
in the Gaza Strip] met with [Hamas Leader] Sheikh Ahmed Yassin, in which
meeting Yassin accepted the principles of the cease-fire communique" (Yedioth
Achronot, 24.7.02). For weeks, Israel has been following deliberations
inside the Tanzim on the idea of declaring a unilateral cease-fire; Israel
was also officially briefed by the European Union, which, together with
Egypt and Saudi Arabia, supported the initiative.
So after 21 months of
violence, a ray of hope could be observed. A chance for cease-fire, for a
cessation of violence. Unilaterally even, without any demands from
occupying side. Israel's reaction was immediate and swift. "One and a
half hours after the Tanzim leadership approved the document at its Jenin
gathering, Israel carried out the assassination of Salah Shehadeh, in the
course of which dozens of civilians were killed and wounded as well. In
this way, Israel apparently destroyed the chance to test the viability of
a cease-fire" (ibid.).
Though this be madness, yet
there is Method in it. Time and again, Israeli assassinations (as well
as other offensive measures) abruptly ended prolonged periods of hope. In
November 2001, the assassination of the Hamas activist Mahmoud Abu Hanoud
was carried out just when the Hamas was respecting for two months its
agreement with Arafat not to attack inside Israel. In January 2002, the
assassination of Raed Karmi ended a few weeks of relative quiet in the
territories. The same pattern repeated itself this time too. The operation
was no mistake; the decision to use a bomb instead of missiles, the more
usual means used by Israel for its extra-judiciary killings, was
undoubtedly deliberate. And whoever gave the order to drop, in the middle
of the night, a 1.000 kg bomb on a residential house in one of the most
densely populated strips on earth, knew very well what he was doing. It
was a premeditated act of state terrorism, a cold-blooded massacre. 14
innocent civilians, 9 of them children, were killed to ensure the
continuation of Palestinian terrorism, in which many more innocent
civilians will be killed.
It has been established beyond
any reasonable doubt that Sharon does not want to stop terrorism, but
rather to perpetuate it. The very moment political negotiations seemed to
be serious, the very moment Palestinians intended to stop terrorism,
Israel dropped a bomb. Whether Sharon should be sent to the Hague or
rather to Guantanamo is one question; a more important one is: why has he
done it?
Genocide, Ethnic Cleansing,
Politicide
What is Israel's interest in
terrorism? Remember its vision for the occupied territories. Israel has
never made a secret of it. Whether it was Ehud Barak, who claimed that UN
resolution 242 did not apply to the West Bank and Gaza, or Ariel Sharon,
who said he would never discuss evacuating a Jewish settlement, Israel's
intentions have always been quite clear: keeping a maximal share of the
occupied territories, with a minimal number of Palestinians.
The almost-total dispossession
of Palestinian land and water, achieved during the Oslo years, has not
satisfied Israel's colonial appetite. It wants more: the Palestinians
should not be there at all. They should either be killed, or deported, or
annihilated as an independent political and social entity. These three,
partly overlapping options can be termed genocide, ethnic cleansing, and
politicide respectively. Politicide – a term suggested by Israel's leading
sociologist
Baruch Kimmerling – has been implemented extensively since last April
("Operation Defensive Shield"). The Palestinian national, public, cultural
and academic infrastructure has been destroyed: Israeli soldiers
systematically demolished everything, from the
Sakakini Cultural Centre in
Ramallah, through the database of the Palestinian Bureau of Statistic,
down to the last hard-disk of a doctor's clinic broken into. Israel's
present policy continues along these lines.
The other two options –
genocide and ethnic cleansing – are waiting for the right opportunity,
which has not arrived yet. But the recent movement of the idea of
"transfer" (i.e. mass deportation) into main-stream Israeli discourse,
together with the warnings of so-called "mega-attacks" (a new term
introduced in the last weeks), are preparing the hearts for such measures.
The Benefits of Terrorism
Here is where terrorism comes
in. Israel cannot carry out these atrocious plans without effective
propaganda. Terrorism has always been an excellent excuse, even more so
since September 11th. The plans were there long before, as documented
painstakingly by Israeli analyst
Tanya Reinhart. They have nothing to do with terrorism: they are aimed
at entrenching the Israeli occupation, making it irreversible and reducing
the Palestinians to ashes. But every terror attack enables Israel to
implement the next steps in its premeditated plans, and to sell it to the
world as "self-defence", "retaliation", "prevention" etc. No wonder, then,
that none of these plans actually stops terrorism: they are not meant to.
And since terrorism gives the best legitimation for carrying them out,
stopping terrorism would be, from Israel's point of view,
counter-productive.
Palestinian terrorism thus
serves Israel's interests on both an international and a national level.
Internationally, Israel's propaganda machine efficiently exploits every
terror attack to strengthen Israel's image as a victim, and to obscure and
justify the proceeding oppression of the Palestinians. Moreover, the
Israeli use of terrorism has now been adopted by the American
administration, that keeps sending Israel money – $200 million last week –
for "fighting terrorism" (note that Israel may spend it as it wishes!);
and, as the
Washington Post put it (28.7.02), "the United States should
not pressure Sharon's government while Palestinian violence continues."
Nationally, as
Spinoza observed back in the 17th century, people in adversity
"know not where to turn, but beg and pray for counsel from every
passer-by. No plan is then too futile, too absurd, or too fatuous for
their adoption; the most frivolous causes will raise them to hope, or
plunge them into despair." Keeping the Israeli people constantly
exposed to fatal violence (and to "terror alerts", true or false) is the
best way to ensure national coherence. Understandably terrified, most
Israelis indeed back the most futile, absurd and fatuous – not to say
immoral – operations of their government, misled to believe that its goal
is securing their lives rather than perpetuating a murderous occupation
that most Israelis do not want.
So Sharon has a vested
interest to keep Palestinian terrorism at a high level. As long as he is
in power, and as long as the Bush administration actually rewards Israel
for Palestinian violence, terrorism will persist. This does not relieve
Palestinians of their moral responsibility; but, on the list of states
supporting terrorism, Israel, as well as the United States, deserve a good
place.
Ran HaCohen was
born in the Netherlands in 1964 and has grown up in Israel. He has B.A. in
Computer Science, M.A. in Comparative Literature and he presently works on
his PhD thesis. He lives in Tel-Aviv, teaches in the Department of
Comparative Literature in Tel-Aviv University. He also works as literary
translator (from German, English and Dutch), and as a literary critic for
the Israeli daily Yedioth Achronoth. His work
has been published widely in Israel. His column appears monthly at Antiwar.com.
Source:
by courtesy & © 2002 Antiwar.com & Ran HaCohen
by the same author:
|
|
|
