by Robert Jensen
I helped kill a Palestinian today.
If you pay taxes to the U.S. government, so did you.
And unless the policies of the U.S. government change, tomorrow will be
no
different.
It is easy for Americans to decry the "cycle of violence" in Palestine,
but
until we acknowledge our own part in that violence, there is little hope
for a just peace in Palestine or the Middle East.
The first step is to abandon the mythology that the United States is a
"neutral broker for peace" in the conflict. A new report by the
Institute
for Southern Studies shows that in the one-year period after the Sharm
el-Sheikh peace agreement in September 1999, the U.S. government pumped
$3.6 billion worth of arms into Israel -- an odd policy for a country
playing a supposedly neutral role.
So, when we hear on the news that Israeli tanks are rolling through the
cities and refugee camps of the West Bank, we should remember those
tanks
were made in the United States and purchased by Israel with U.S. aid.
The
Israeli jets and helicopters used in the assault are American F-16s,
Blackhawks and Apaches. Machine guns, grenade launchers, missiles and
bombs
-- made in the USA, paid for with our tax dollars -- are being used to
crush the Palestinian people. That means we must face two realties:
First, the current Israeli attack on West Bank towns is not a war on
terrorism, but part of a long and brutal war against the Palestinian
people
for land and resources. If Israel is serious about ending terrorism, it
would end its 35-year illegal military occupation of the West Bank and
Gaza. Until it demonstrates a willingness to do that, Israeli calls for
peace ring hollow and its attempts to achieve security through force
will
only make it less secure.
Second, Israel's war against the Palestinians would not be possible
without
U.S. military and economic support -- $3 billion a year in direct aid.
While the whole world stands against Israel's occupation, our government
provides the political and diplomatic cover that allows Israel to flout
international law. Specific Israeli policies sometimes draw mild
criticisms
from U.S. leaders, and those criticisms have grown stronger in recent
days
as Israel has ignored calls for a pullback of forces. But Israel can
continue to ignore the international consensus -- and the U.N. Security
Council resolutions calling on it to end the occupation -- because of
U.S.
support.
U.S. officials recently have distanced themselves from the extreme
violence
of the Sharon government and the Likud Party, but it is folly to think
all
would be fine if only a Labor Party government were in power. The
differences between the two major parties in Israel are more of style
than
substance. Take the question of settlements in the occupied territories.
We are told repeatedly that Israel desperately wants peace. If that is
true, why has the number of Israeli settlers living in the West Bank and
Gaza almost doubled since the Oslo peace process began nearly a decade
ago?
Given that those settlements are one of the most serious obstacles to a
peaceful solution, why would the Israeli governments -- Labor and Likud
alike -- expand settlements in territory it illegally occupies during a
so-called peace process?
The ultimate solution to the conflict in the Middle East is a regional
peace conference under an international banner that takes seriously
international law. There must be regional arms control, which should be
part of a movement to reduce the insane levels of armaments globally (of
which the United States is the leading salesperson). The most important
contribution the United States could make is to stop blocking that
process.
But right now, the United States can help defuse the immediate crisis by
using the leverage its aid to Israel provides. We the American people
should pressure our government to make a clear statement: Israel must
not
only end its current brutal offensive but also must take meaningful
steps
to end the occupation, and the United States must withdraw support from
Israel until it agrees to do so.
If we fail to do that, then we cannot escape the knowledge that
Americans
are partly responsible for the next missile fired into a Palestinian
town,
the next shell lobbed into a Palestinian home, the next Israeli bullet
that
cuts down an innocent Palestinian.
Robert Jensen is a professor of journalism at the University of Texas
and
author of "Writing Dissent: Taking Radical Analysis from the Margins to
the Mainstream"
/
His pamphlet "Citizens of the Empire: Thoughts on Patriotism, Dissent,
and
Hope" can be downloaded for free at
http://www.nowarcollective.com/citizensoftheempire.pdf
Source: