|
|

|
The Divine Wind
:: A Homage to
Simone Weil ::
by Israel Shamir
Walls of cold rain and hail encompassed my Jaffa. Streets turned into
ferocious streams and snow touched palm trees and whitened the sidewalks
of subtropical Tel Aviv, in violent counterpoint to the violet skies
hanging low, just a handbreadth above the belfries and minarets, as the
hurricane rushed masses of sand and rain clouds over the deep cleft of the
Dead Sea into Palestine. A sandstorm of unheard-of magnitude broke all
over the Middle East, stopping American tanks in the desert, blinding the
pilots of their planes, covering the crosshairs of their weapons,
threatening to capsize the monstrous battleships in the Gulf. A hundred
armoured troop carriers were savaged by the sandstorm. Such a Divine Wind
had saved Japan from the Mongol landing of Kublai Khan; such a storm had
preserved Elizabethan England from Spanish occupation.
Like the Spaniards of the Armada on their way to English shores, the
Mammonite force was not prepared for a meeting with this divine
intervention. The invaders had planned to enter the soft underbelly of
Asia as easily and smoothly as the dagger of Jack the Ripper had torn
defenceless women. No opposition was envisaged.
John Wayne or Burt Lancaster handed over their spare guns to the unarmed
foe before the fatal shootout. But the Mammonites are not the noble
American heroes of the old Westerns. They were not satisfied with their
technical superiority and the ten-to-one numerical advantage of the
American population over the Iraqi people; they demanded to disarm their
enemy. The cowards landed only after the obedient UN obligingly disarmed
the Iraqis and smashed their last rusty missiles.
They did not expect this supernatural intervention of the elements because
Mammonite power is based, in Dostoyevsky’s words, on the secret knowledge
that there is no God. But the material world is not dead matter.
Everything in this world is alive and interconnected: our history, our
present and future, our visions and our social structure, sandstorms and
hurricanes, earthquakes and revolutions are part and parcel of the tightly
connected trinity of Earth, Man and God. The will of the people, of
billions of men and women opposing the Anglo-American aggression, was
expressed in mammoth demos around the globe and in the solemn halls of the
United Nations, but it was scorned by the Mammonites. This will of the
people was translated into sandstorms to remind us that our wishes are as
powerful as those of the Olympian gods, and that the integrated will of
the people is indeed Vox Dei. By disregarding the Will of God and Man, the
War Party sowed the seeds of its destruction, for it is intoxicated by its
Might.
II
“The strong are never absolutely strong,
nor are the weak absolutely weak. Those who have Might on loan from fate
count on it too much and are destroyed. Might is as pitiless to the man
who possesses it (or thinks he does) as it is to its victims. The second
it crushes, the first it intoxicates”, wrote Simone Weil, the French
philosopher and divine who witnessed the great intoxication of Might
called World War Two. She referred to the Trojan War when she extracted
this sublime lesson from the Iliad: “The human race is not divided up, in
the Iliad, into conquered and conquerors. There is no refuge from fate;
learn not to admire Might, not to hate the enemy, not to scorn the
vanquished”.
This modern saint who was born into a Jewish family joined the Communists,
fought in Spain, worked with the workers of Renault and followed St Teresa
into the Church, Simone Weil cast the Trojan War as a tragedy for both
the Greeks and the Trojans, for they did not stop when they could have. At
a certain point, the Greeks could have had 90% of their demands, but they
preferred to risk all and to win all. At another point, the Trojans could
have had 90% of their wishes met, but they also chose to risk all. The two
parties suffered, both lost their best men, and the victorious Achaeans
were defeated some fifty years later by the invading Dorian wave.
In a similar way, the Nazis went too far in 1939. The world accommodated
some of their demands, for Prague had been under German rule for hundreds
of years, and the French control over the Ruhr Valley was not based in law
and tradition. The German demand for unhindered access to Danzig and
Königsberg was not an unreasonable one. Hitler could have stopped at this
and got away with it. ‘Appeasement’ was sound politics and reasonable
course in 1938. But in 1939-1940 the German Reich proved its
insatiability. Czechoslovakia, Poland, Yugoslavia, Greece, Denmark – many
states were overrun, until the world decided to put an end to Nazi
expansion. The dreadful war ruined Europe and Russia, and prepared the
ground for the Mammonite accession.
The Zionists went too far. They could have had a decent share in the sweet
land of Palestine, willing Palestinian workers and friends, an endless
supply of cheap oil and resources from the hinterland to the Haifa
refineries, a very good life for themselves and their children. But they
wanted to have all, and to leave nothing to the vanquished. That is why
their days are numbered.
The Mammonites are repeating the errors of Hitler and Sharon. First,
Afghanistan. Nobody could understand why the Mammonites decided to attack
this remote kingdom, but they got away with it, with the mass slaughter of
prisoners, with the destruction of Afghani livelihood, with unleashing the
opium production previously tethered by the Taliban. Now, Iraq. The battle
is still undecided, and already Michael A. Ledeen of AEI (the American
Enterprise Institute), a Zionist
and Mammonite (if these twin ideologies can be separated) reminds us,
“Iraq is a battle, not a war. After Baghdad, Tehran, Damascus, Riyadh” [1]. And afterwards, Paris, Berlin, Moscow,
Beijing. Today they wish to remove Saddam Hussein; tomorrow they will
demand the head of Chirac, Schroeder and Putin.
They are already demanding full boycott of France [2] and follow-up action is on the way. Here is
one of the Mammonite ads: “Boycott France because American lives and
security are at stake. France has every right to disagree with America.
But France has moved from simple dissent to
active hostility toward America. The French President Chirac warned East
European nations that if they side with America, France will oppose their
membership in the European Union. This week, William Safire reported in
the New York Times that France has secretly been helping to arm Iraq, and
has been helping Iraq build long-range missiles. These same missiles may
soon be used against American soldiers”. Safire is a leading Zionist
Commissar, and his ‘report’ is a
Zionist fatwa against France and its President. In the report[3] of the warmongers’ get-together, this
plan is unveiled: “Kristol urged that we split Germany off from France but
noted that such "intelligent diplomacy may be too much to hope for from
the State Department." When Perle declared that "Americans are not
vindictive", Ledeen interrupted to say that, in the case of France, he
certainly hoped we would be”.
That is why there is an urgent need to
borrow a leaf from the American book. In 1823, the U.S President James
Monroe upheld the Monroe Doctrine in his annual message to Congress.
Declaring that the Old World and New World had different systems and must
remain distinct spheres, Monroe made four basic points: (1) The United
States would not interfere in the internal affairs of or the wars between
European powers; (2) the United States recognized and would not interfere
with existing colonies and dependencies in the Western Hemisphere; (3) the
Western Hemisphere was closed to future colonization; and (4) any attempt
by a European power to oppress or control any nation in the Western
Hemisphere would be viewed as a hostile act against the United States.
Now is the right time to proclaim the fully symmetric Eurasian Doctrine.
Let the US stay away from the Old World of Eurasia, and stop its attempts
to oppress or control any nation in Eurasia. Britain should decide whether
it intends to act as a Trojan Horse, in the apt words of de Gaulle, or
sincerely join Europe. Iraq, or any other country in Eurasia, is not open
to American colonisation. The free nations of Eurasia, led by France,
Germany, Russia and China, should condemn the Mammonite aggression in the
UN and call for sanctions against the aggressors. The US dollar should
cease to be the reserve currency, and the US debt of $ 6.4 T (trillion)
should be called in. The US-owned media, the tool of indoctrination,
should be treated as a racist propaganda vehicle for having sanctified the
killing of Arabs. US forces should leave Eurasia and peace will be
restored in the interests of all sides.
III
The unjust sanctions against the noble people of Iraq should be lifted
immediately. These sanctions caused the deaths of millions of innocents,
including a million Iraqi children. They prepared the ground for the
Mammonite aggression. The terrible campaign of demonisation carried out by
the Mammonite media against Saddam Hussein, the Iraqis and Arabs in
general, should be denounced as racist bigotry.
Saddam Hussein is not a Santa Claus nor St Francis. He is not a gentle
king-philosopher. But President Allende of Chile was the most liberal and
progressive ruler, and still he was overthrown and assassinated by the
CIA-sponsored General Pinochet, this great friend of Zionist Mammonites
Margaret Thatcher, Henry Kissinger and Conrad Black. The liberal and
progressive Prime Minister of Iran, Mohamed Mossadegh, was overthrown as
well, and replaced by the authoritarian rule of the Shah. Saddam Hussein
was brought into being by the very spirit of the Arab world as its
defender, for a civilisation (in Toynbee’s sense) meeting a lethal
challenge produces stern and warlike leaders able to meet that challenge.
When Russia was about to be attacked by the most cruel and dangerous enemy
of its history, Russia’s spirit brought forth a steely and stern,
defrocked Georgian priest and made him ruler of the Soviet Union. A
kinder, softer man would not have been able to sacrifice millions of
Russians (including his own son) to defeat the Third Reich.
The Arab world was mismanaged for centuries by outside powers: by the
Ottoman Turks, by the colonialists, and now by the Mammonite neo-colonial
web. Saddam Hussein is the first strong independent ruler of Arabs since
Saladin; it is not a blind coincidence that he was born in Tikrit, the
city that gave birth to the noble vanquisher of Crusaders. He can unite
the Arab world and restore the Caliphate – like de Gaulle and Adenauer
restored the Carolingian Empire. This has to be done, as the present
parcelling of Arab lands has created blocks of rich sheiks, protected oil
wells and impoverished masses. Saddam is able to confront Mammonites and
Zionists, and that is why he is much loved by the people of the Middle
East.
Saddam is vilified by the Mammonite
media, but this only proves he is the right man in the right place. For
whomever they glorify is surely their collaborator. They loved Mikhail
Gorbachev, who demolished the USSR; they love Tony Blair, who turned England
into an American colony. John Pilger described it well in his introduction
to the new edition of the great classic of Phillip Knightley,
The First Casualty [4]: “The media could praise the
`miraculously few casualties’ in the Gulf War (meaning the few British and
American casualties), while the horror of up to a quarter-million Iraqis slaughtered by the US-led forces was consigned to
oblivion.” Yesterday on Israeli TV the
cruel ex-defence minister of Israel, Fuad Ben Eliezer,
murderer of hundreds of Palestinian civilians, called Saddam Hussein, ‘a
fearsome man’. For me, and for other people of the Middle East, whoever
frightens Ben Eliezer can’t be all that bad.
Saddam has passed with honours a severe test of
war: his people remain loyal to him and are fighting the Mammonite
aggressor. We should support him in this hour of doom, like Winston
Churchill supported Joseph Stalin. Do not worry: when the Arab world
regains its independence within the framework of friendly Eurasia, it will
produce kind and gentle rulers, lovers of the arts and letters.
IV
American and English soldiers were sent to commit the
worst of war crimes, that of aggression against a sovereign state. But
they weren’t sent in the interests of Americans and Englishmen. They were
sent to extend the Mammonite rule all over the Middle East. We do not
identify the Mammonites with the people of America. The Mammonites come
and go, while the people remain forever. Nor should the Europeans repeat
the American folly and try to ‘liberate’ America. Let Americans free
themselves from the Mammonite yoke. It is in their interests, for the
Mammonites are not a forgiving lot. They will not forgive anybody who
stands in their way. They will try to crush the internal American
opposition. They have stored all the photos of participants in the
anti-war demos, and they will use them, sooner or
later.
The Mammonites are blinded by their sheer power, by
their coup of having harnessed America to their master plans. Their lack
of compassion has manifested in Guantanamo, where they cage their
unfortunate prisoners. Their chutzpah was
manifest when they demanded to disarm Iraq and attacked it afterwards,
turning all of us into their unwilling henchmen. Their lack of sincerity
is proven by their massive campaign of lies and disinformation. Their
godless nature is seen in their refusal to obey the pastoral instructions
of the Churches. (Only some Zionist TV preachers
support their war.)
The Mammonites utilise the Zionist network and mislead
the Jews into obedience. The US Senate started the war by presenting the
Jewish state with ten billion dollars, and in return, “God Bless America”,
a major Israeli newspaper, Yediot Aharonot, headlined today’s edition, and its web edition declared that “the hearts and
prayers of Israelis go out to the US armed forces”.
“Much of the ideological justification and political
pressure for war against Iraq has come from right-wing American Zionists,
many of them Jews closely allied to Israel's Prime Minister,
Ariel Sharon, and occupying
influential positions both inside and outside the Bush administration. It
is a Bush-Sharon war against Iraq”, wrote Patrick Seale, the British
observer and expert on the Middle East. Seale is right – up to a point.
The ‘left-wing’ American Zionists, many of them Jews, are as ridden with
Mammonitis as are their right-wing brethren.
Bob Norman reports from South Florida [5]: “Robert Wexler has made himself one of the
nation's loudest critics of President Bush. The liberal congressman
attacked Bush on the environment, prescription drugs, corporate scandals,
tax cuts for the rich and the President's 2000
election tactics. But Wexler said on TV that war on Iraq is a swell idea.
Wexler and several other Jewish Democrats in Congress, led by
Connecticut's Senator Joe Lieberman and a gaggle of representatives from
California and New York, are spoiling for that fight. And because these
same politicians can usually be counted on to anchor the Democrats'
opposition to Bush, they have helped to destroy any hope of the
Party's reining in Dick Cheney's dogs of war”.
The US and UK Zionists do not endanger
their power base by supporting the war. While their positions in the media
are well known, “there are some 15 Jewish soldiers (0.03% of the British
invasion force in Iraq) among the 45,000 British fighters currently in
action in the US-led campaign
[6], reports Haaretz. This disparity
explains a lot, including the ‘chicken-hawks’ label. Their mad ideas
include restoration of Greater Israel from
the Nile to the Euphrates and
‘historic revenge’ upon Babylon for the destruction of the Temple of Solomon in BC 586, as called for by David Ben Gurion, the
founder of Israel. Needless to say, these insane plans are not in the true
interest of Americans nor of the
sane majority of Jews.
While rejecting the Mammonite-Zionist covenant, we do
not identify the enemy with a religious or ethnic group. Indeed, many
Americans of Jewish origin stand against the war and against the
Mammonites. I do not want to mention again their venerable names for there
is no need to distinguish between them and other good Americans. The enemy
is the Mammonite ideology, `a weird crossbreed
of Roman and Hebrew attitudes’ in the
terminology of Simone Weil. She wrote:
“The Romans and Hebrews were much admired and quoted
every time one wanted to justify a crime. For Romans, conquered people
were objects of contempt, and they had no epics, no tragedies. For
Hebrews, cruelty to the vanquished is permissible, indeed indispensable.”
Simone Weil perceived the Gospels as the last and brilliant manifestation
of the Hellene spirit of the Iliad, the spirit of compassion that
sees the humanity of both sides in the war. That
is the spirit the Americans could invoke.
The compassionate and fiercely independent America of
Henry Thoreau and Gore Vidal could and should win its long battle against
the Mammonite spirit. Provided both main parties of the US are infiltrated
to equal extent, the way out lies in giving more, much more, power to the states,
while reducing the Federal Government’s functions to managing the US Mail. The best American intellectual magazine,
Harpers’ Monthly, recently drew an idyllic picture of the world, where
instead of the monstrous US, some seven or eight states (California, New
England, Texas, the Confederacy, etc.) occupy the landmass of the
North America between Mexico and Canada. Such smaller and more manageable
states (the size of France!) would be able to
form meaningful relations between their people and their landscape, create
real and not imaginary communities, produce art and relate to Man and God.
Americans will be able to live much better, happier and more inspired life. For instance, the $75B (seventy-five billion) America is spending
on the Iraq war could provide fifty million Americans
with free health care, or six million young men with university education.
Americans would be able to celebrate the Nativity of Christ, not only
‘seasons’ at Christmas, and His Resurrection at Easter, without fear.
Even the Mammonite spirit of commerce would shake off
its destructiveness if confined to the Big Apple. Who knows, maybe
independent New York will re-create the glory of Venice, the great trading
republic, once disengaged from the huge continent.
Israel, the exclusivist Jewish state,
has no place in the free Middle East; but its inhabitants, adoptive
Palestinians of Jewish faith or origin, will be welcomed and desired
citizens of the Palestinian Commonwealth, on par with native Palestinians.
Their abilities will help them lead their common country to prosperity and
equality. Thus, the noble Zionist goal of bringing Jews back to the home
of their ancestors will be accomplished, and the descendents of Jews
elsewhere would be able to forget separatism and blend peacefully into the
nations they live among.
Notes:
[1] New York Sun , March 19, 2003:
[2]
http://www.newsmaxstore.com/a/boycottad
[3]http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID
=31725
[4]
http://evatt.labor.net.au/news/201.html
[5]
http://www.newtimesbpb.com/issues/2002-09-26/norman.html/1/index.html
[6]
http://www.haaretzdaily.com/hasen/spages/275621.html
Mr. Israel Shamir is a
Russian Israeli writer and journalist. He wrote for Haaretz,
BBC,
Pravda and translated Agnon, Joyce and Homer into Russian. He
lives in Tel Aviv and writes a weekly column in the Vesti, the
biggest
Russian-language paper in Israel.
Source:
by courtesy & © 2003 Israel
Shamir
by the same author:
|

|
|