by Sherri Muzher
“We’re proud of what we did because we think
it’s what America stands for, that no one ever, ever should be
punished and discriminated against or killed or uprooted because of
their religion or their ethnic heritage,’’ said President Bill
Clinton as he visited the Stankovic Camp in Macedonia in June, 1999.
Less than two weeks later, President Clinton said,
“I would like it if the Palestinian people felt free and were free
to live wherever they like, wherever they want to live.” Some
interpreted these comments to signify the president’s support of
the right of return of the 3.7 million Palestinian refugees,
although within hours of the second remark U.S. assurances were made
to the Israeli Embassy that U.S. policy had not changed in this
regard. That policy, according to a U.S. State Department official,
is that the issue of the Palestinian right of return is to be
decided in final status negotiations.
And here we are in 2001, and Clinton is pressuring
the Palestinians into giving up their right of return to what is now
Israel -- guaranteed by international laws. In Kosovo, we saw the
resolve of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) to make
life miserable for the Serbians in Yugoslavia and the message was
simple: We’ll stop the bombing when you stop driving the Albanian
Muslims out of Kosovo. Whether the use of NATO military measures was
necessary continues to be a topic for debate, but the decisiveness
to reverse the flow of refugees from their homeland was nothing
short of remarkable and exemplary. Within days, busloads of
refugees, escorted by representatives of the U.N. High Commission
for Refugees (UNCHR) were heading back to the Kosovo capital of
Pristina. Hundreds of thousands of Kosovar refugees have since
returned to towns and villages allover Kosovo..
What was so strikingly different between the
atrocities which befell the Kosovar refugees and those that befell
the Palestinians of 1948? Consider this chilling testimony, which
would bring a sense of déjà vu for any Kosovar refugee.
“Outside the gate the soldiers stopped us and
ordered everyone to throw all valuables onto a blanket. One young
man and his wife of six weeks, friends of our family, stood near me.
He refused to give up his money. Almost casually, the soldier pulled
up his rifle and shot the man. He fell, bleeding and dying while his
bride screamed and cried. I felt nauseated and sick, my whole body
numbed by shock waves. That night I cried, too, as I tried to sleep
along side thousands on the ground. Would I ever see my home again?
Would the soldiers kill my loved ones, too?” --Father Rantisi of
Ramallah’s Evangelical Home for Boys, author of Blessed Are the
Peacemakers Much of the world’s shock and horror at Serb ethnic
cleansing of Kosovars stemmed particularly from Serbian atrocities
intended to frighten Kosovars away. Again, comparisons to the
Palestinian nakba are haunting. The infamous massacre at Deir Yassin
was cited by Israeli forces to instill fear in other Palestinians
that if they did not flee, they would meet the same fate as the
massacred men, women and children of that village, seized by Jewish
militias in April 1948. Essentially the massacre was perpetrated by
design, as were the recent Serbian atrocities. Former Israeli Prime
Minister Menachem Begin, who ordered the Deir Yassin massacre, once
referred to it as one of the greatest victories of Zionism because
its “political and economic significance…can hardly be
overestimated.”
Dozens more massacres occurred. 750,000 Palestinians
fled Palestine.
It's true that times were different back in 1948.
The CNN cameras were missing, and the world was still experiencing
the guilt of its complacency during the abhorrent tragedy of the
Jewish Holocaust. That is all the more reason for the U.S. to end
the suffering of Palestinian refugees in 2000. The U.S. prides
itself
as a nation that not only is a military superpower but also a moral
superpower. To merit that label, then it’s time for President
Clinton to stop pressuring Palestinians into accepting what he knows
is wrong. Clinton should also note that 74% of Americans support the
right of return for Palestinians, according to a Zogby poll.
In an era when human rights have become a
corner stone of U.S.
foreign policy, President Clinton's penchant for a legacy, domestic
politics and Israel’s well-heeled lobbying groups should take a
backseat. A true peace in the Middle East will have to provide for
Palestinians to live with dignity. Otherwise, our rhetoric in Kosovo
was meaningless.
Sherri Muzher is a Freelance
writer for the Washington Report on Middle East Affairs, and Former
Executive Director of the Council for Palestinian Restitution and
Repatriation.
Source: