The magnificent Coliseum in Rome. The
chilling ruins of Pompeii. The wondrous cliffs of San
Marino. The resilient Parthenon in Athens. And the
conversation. Yes, the conversation. All were memorable
events during my time in Europe back in 1996.
The conversation took place on a flight from London to
Rome. The gentleman who sat next to me was a young European male. He
looked at me with a puzzled look.
"Italiana?" asked the man.
"No, sono Palestinieze-Americana," I answered in the
little Italian I knew.
"Ahh, si," he smiled.
The conversation thankfully turned to English. I found
out he was a Portuguese travel agent, and was on his way to reunite
with his Italian wife. We talked about a myriad of subjects, but it
was his thoughts on the Palestinian-Israeli conflict which intrigued
me most. Though Mario did not have a formal education, he seemed quite
knowledgeable on the topic. And while he disagreed with some of the
Palestinian tactics for freedom, his views were a welcome change from
the usual pro-Israeli views of many of my fellow Americans. I knew
this had much to do with the more objective European media.
There was one specific statement he made, which I will
never forget.
He leaned his head back and said matter-of-factly, "We
know the Israelis run your Congress."
I smiled to myself. This was sounding like a
conversation I have with fellow Arabs. An over-simplification,
perhaps. And yet, a profound statement since this is how a foreign
individual was viewing our foreign policy.
The US Congress, created by Article 1 of the US
Constitution, has a variety of legislative powers, including coining
money and maintaining a military. Congress also frames US foreign
policy. The US Constitution is arguably the greatest among sister
nations' constitutions, and the vision of the US Constitution's
architects has generally materialized.
But what our founding fathers probably never banked on
was the influence of soft money and lobbyists. They couldn't have
imagined that our foreign policy would be guided by pocketbooks and
interests which defy the values our nation was founded on, such as
freedom and dignity for all.
"We know the Israelis run your Congress." Again, a
possible over-simplification, but one that deserves some scrutiny.
Israeli interests are promoted by the American Israel
Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC), recognized as the most powerful
foreign lobbying organization on Capitol Hill. Since 1978, AIPAC has
contributed more than $34 million dollars to congressional candidates
-- translating into funding for more than 1,700 candidates. In fact,
according to the Washington Report on Middle East Affairs, AIPAC
contributed $2,044,606 during the 1999-2000 election cycle. And in the
world of politics, it is money that makes the Hill go round.
The ability of Jewish-American Zionists to rally
around Israel using such methods as mass harassment of US media [as
Eric Alterman of the Nation pointed out recently in an MSNBC article],
as well as the harassment of US politicians [which former Congressman
Paul Findley pointed out in his book, "They Dare To Speak Out"] have
all contributed to the notion that Zionists manipulate the domestic
political climate on the Middle East
Has all of this been effective in silencing Congress
in recent weeks on the unprecedented Israeli bloodshed in the West
Bank? Well, as Arab American Institute President Jim Zogby told the
Los Angeles Times, "There is reasoned discourse [over the Middle East]
in almost every sector of society except Congress."
Consider some of the following quotations heard
recently in Congress.
Representative Tom Lantos (D- San Mateo) prepared to
introduce a resolution expressing U.S. "solidarity with Israel in its
fight against terrorism."
Senator Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.): "The U.S. should
stand by Israel's side in the quest for peace and security." She made
these remarks on the floor as she announced that she would introduce
legislation to cut U.S. ties to the Palestinian Authority if Secretary
of State Colin L. Powell's mission in the region does not produce
results.
And then there's Senate Majority Leader Tom Daschle
(D-SD). "I think that some show of support for Israel is important and
critical." Interestingly, Daschle was criticized by the Republican
Party for recent comments about America's war on terror in
Afghanistan. Daschle had questioned the continued success of the
campaign, and further stated that if ex-Taliban leader Mullah Mohammed
Omar and Osama bin Laden were not captured, "we will have failed."
"How dare Sen. Daschle criticize President Bush while
we are fighting our war on terrorism, especially when we have troops
in the field," said Senate Minority Leader Trent Lott, R-Miss., in a
written statement. "He should not be trying to divide our country
while we are united."
One can apparently assume that the bi-partisan
congressional chorus of dissent against President George Bush's
repeated calls for Israel to withdraw from the Palestinian Occupied
Territories does not divide the country, or make our foreign policy
seem ludicrous in the face of worldwide pro-Palestinian
demonstrations. UN Resolution 1402, a resolution demanding Israel's
withdrawal, presumably means nothing to the Congress either -- though
the US voted for it.
American journalists have been prevented from covering
several areas of the West Bank, international human rights
organizations are unable to deliver urgently needed food and medical
supplies, and reports of a massacre in the Jenin refugee camp have
outraged the world. Shootings at the Church of the Nativity in
Bethlehem by Israeli snipers do not raise an eyebrow on the Hill, and
neither do scenes of utter devastation on our TV screens. Israel's
Ariel Sharon has spat on our demands for withdrawal, prompting
questions as to who is calling the shots. Does the US, which gives
billions in taxpayer dollars to Israel, call the shots? Or does Israel
control us?
"We know the Israelis run your Congress."
Yes, Mario, wherever you are. Your words certainly
seem on the mark right now.
Note:
Zionism is viewed as a national movement by many Jews,
and is largely responsible for the creation of the State of Israel. The
United Nations, however, previously defined the ideology as a form of
racism.
Sherri Muzher, who holds a
Jurist Doctor in International and Comparative Law, is a
Palestinian-American activist and free lance journalist.
Source: