It is well-known that Saddam Hussein gassed thousands of Iraqis, but usually
left unmentioned is that those victims were in armed revolt against his
regime. What would any U.S. President do if American citizens took up armed
revolt against the U.S. Government? We have a clue in what took place in
Waco, Texas a few years ago. There was no armed revolt, just some citizens
with unregistered firearms. The U.S. government considered those armed
citizens to be such a risk that the government sent in tanks and military
personnel, ultimately using military personnel to set a conflagration which
burned scores of women and children alive. Imagine if those people had
actually been involved in revolt against the government!
The U.S. stresses "freedom and democracy" as a goal for a reconstituted
Iraq. Of course some of the nations providing military support in the
"coalition of the willing" are already democracies, and while their citizenry
is voicing 90% disapproval of the preemptive war of aggression and conquest,
the democratically-elected leadership of Britain, Australia, and Turkey
adopt policies directly contrary to the loudly expressed will of their
populations. So much for democracy, but proof the coercion and bribery of
leadership for corporate interests is what Western-style "democracy" is
usually all about.
The U.S. wants to spread democracy and freedom, but their latest attempt at
nation building in Afghanistan has resulted in a puppet president Karzai (a
former Chevron official) who is afraid to leave his own offices, while
brutal warlords remain in control of the county. No democracy yet, while
the U.S. military pussy-foots around the warlords and tries not to get in
their way.
So, America bravely presses forward towards "liberating" Iraq. But don't
mention it to the Kurds up north, who are dreading the recent arrival of a
thousand and a half Turkish troops (with more likely to come) for the
purpose of preventing the establishment of a Kurdish independent republic,
or to prevent an unacceptable refugee burden.
A Kurdish Democratic Republic would be too unsettling to the region for the
Bush administration (or any American administration) to ever allow or
promote THAT much democracy!
What really counts in Iraq is military firepower and corporate economic
power. Dick Cheney, American Vice-President has been more or less totally
absent from the American public's view, but only because he has basically
reverted to his pre-election corporate role of lining up contracts for his
old company and others to come in and mop up Iraq with billions of dollars'
worth of reconstruction and infrastructure and oilfield repair contracts.
Forget democracy, and bring on the corporate bureaucracy and lets get that
Iraqi oil flowing to pay the American debts for liberating her! Maybe
American corporations will be democratically elected or appointed to do a
little "nation building" which seemed very distasteful to Bush when Clinton
was President, but seems like a fine idea now.
Was it all necessary? Or was any of it necessary? Well, the U.N. was
making great strides in disarming Iraq and would have done so in reasonable
time frames without warfare. But Bush needed war like like a cruise missile
needs propellant. His presidency didn't even take off and begin flying
until 9/11 pushed his military/industrial complex ambitions onto the front
burner. No wonder Bush wouldn't allow the U.S. military to shoot down any
of the four hijacked planes on 9/11, even after one World Trade Center tower
was struck and even though the Pentagon lies under the most heavily defended
airspace in the world. The hits had to occur to get the ball rolling for
the Bush agenda, and so the military was stood down that day and thousands
of Americans, including Pentagon personnel had to die so the Bush agenda
could come to life.
From a Bush perspective, which is limited in scope, narrowly focused and
myopic as a house mouse's eyesight, the situation looks very good and very
promising. Baghdad is burning. Saddam is squirming. Congressional support
is firming.
But the rest of the world, and many, many Americans see the
hypocrisy of
pseudo-democracy. Some of us see a regime change ahead in Washington at the
time of the next election. And we see war crimes trials as Perle and
Rumsfeld fail to bring down the U.N. and Rumsfeld and maybe even Bush and
Powell get charged with crimes against humanity.
At least, there is room for hope.
Note:
-
Halliburton Makes a Killing on Iraq War
The writer is a member of several falconry and ornithological clubs and
organizations. He contributed above article to Media Monitors Network (MMN) from California, USA.
