On September 14, 1982, the Christian
president-elect of Lebanon, Bashir Gemayel, was assassinated in a bomb
attack at one of his Phalangist Party offices in Christian East Beirut. As
a consequence, his allies the Israelis, who had invaded Lebanon and had
effected the evacuation of the Palestine Liberation Organisation and the
large bulk of its guerrillas from the Western, Muslim area of Beirut under
international supervision, invaded the West of the city, in violation of
American-arranged agreements. The then Israeli Minister of Defence, Ariel
Sharon, ordered Phalangist militiamen into the Palestinian refugee camps
of Sabra and Shatilla, under Israeli supervision, to clean out, as he put
it, any remaining terrorists. There, the militiamen carried out a massacre
of some 800 people, most of them civilians, over a period of two nights
and a day.
Within minutes of entering the
Sabra-Shatilla camp in West Beirut twenty years ago we knew what had
happened and how it had happened: the hundreds of Palestinian refugees
lying murdered and mutilated in their shanty homes, alleyways and gutters,
most of them civilians, many women and children, and babes in arms, were
the victims of avenging Christian Lebanese militiamen acting under the
protection and control of the invading Israeli Army. It was, we reported
during the coming hours, either criminal negligence on the part of the
Israeli commanders and their officers, or deadly connivance.
Our judgments were confirmed more than
a year later when Israel's own state inquiry into the massacre, the Kahan
Judicial Commission, found that the Israeli Minister of Defence, Ariel
Sharon, bore personal responsibility for the killings; and that generals
under his command, including the Israeli Chief of Staff, Rafel Eitan, were
to a greater or lesser degree culpable by acts of commission and omission
and had derelicted their duty as officers.
To put it simply: in the late summer of
1982, towards the end of the three-month Israeli onslaught against the
Palestine Liberation Organisation and its military and political
infrastructure in Lebanon, wreaking havoc and death on thousands of
Lebanese and Palestinian civilians, there was no-one familiar with the
region with eyes to see and brains to employ who did not know that the
Lebanese Christian Maronites, as represented in strength by the Phalangist
Party and its military wing, the Lebanese Forces, regarded the
Palestinians as vermin. They were poised for revenge and extermination if
they had the chance. We all knew it and the Phalangists made no secret of
it, even to Israeli officers as they made their way up Lebanon.
Six years earlier I had covered an
earlier Phalangist massacre of Palestinians, of similar proportions, at
the Tel al-Zaatar refugee camp, in Christian East Beirut. The hatred had
not dimmed and the civil strife in Lebanon had burned on, overtaken now in
1982 by this massive Israeli incursion against the Palestinian-Muslim part
of the country, with Phalangist support and collusion.
To believe that the Israelis were
unaware of this visceral hatred of the Palestinians would have been to
attribute to them an uncharacteristic and frankly unbelievable ignorance
of the Middle East in general and Lebanon in particular. The Israeli Chief
of Staff himself, General Eitan, told members of the Israeli Cabinet, on
the day the Phalangists entered the Palestinian camp, that there would be
"...an eruption of revenge which...I can imagine how it will begin, but
not how it will end." He added: " I can already see in their eyes what
they are waiting for."
Yet he turned a blind eye to the
murderous process. As the Phalangist force of around 150 men, under the
command of their Intelligence Chief, Elie Hobeika, prepared to move into
the camp on September 16, an Israeli Brigadier General, a divisional
commander, Amos Yaron, warned them not to harm civilians. It was a warning
he was to repeat twice that day. He must have, evidently, feared the
worst---yet he too turned his face from the horror as it unfolded.
Within hours of the Christian Lebanese
Forces entering the feebly defended camp, which two divisions of the
Israeli Army virtually surrounded, and overlooked, at close range, often
from high buildings, with their high-tech communications and observation
equipment, reports started to circulate in Israeli military ranks of
mayhem, of civilian slaughter. As we were to see, so vividly, scenes I
shall never shake from my internal vision, it was a human culling of
ghastly brutality. There was beating, rape, torture, mutilation,
evisceration---I saw it: ritualised death blended with cold-blooded
execution.
Already on September 17, the Friday, 24
hours into the massacre, there were Israel eye-witness reports of
killings. One Phalangist, asked by an Israeli soldier why he was killing
babies, said, " "because they will grow up to be terrorists."
That night the Israelis allowed even
more Phalangists into the camp, with bulldozers, ominously ( for ploughing
under corpses ). It was Saturday morning before the Israeli Army ejected
them.
Having enabled this carnage, either by
carelessness or with a nod and a wink, the higher ranks of the Army on the
spot and their political bosses seemed incurious about the Palestinians'
fate during its long progress and all reports of it were ignored,
unpursued or ended in blind alleys until I broke the news on the BBC at
5pm local time, September 18, two days after the salughter had commenced.
But much earlier than that, nearly
24 hours after the killing began, with reports of 300 dead already
circulating among Israeli officers, General Eitan, said the Kahan
commission, had reported to the Phalangists at their port headquarters in
East Beirut that "there was a very good impression that [they] had carried
out the mission they had been assigned...and there was no feeling that
something irregular had occurred or was about to occur in the camps."
The commission found that " everyone
who had anything to do with events in Lebanon should have felt
apprehension about a massacre in the camps...It was well known that the
Phalangists harbour deep enmity for the Palestinians, viewing them as a
source of the troubles that afflicted Lebanon during the years of the
civil war...[and after ] the profound shock in the wake of Bashir's [
Gemayel's ] death..."
The outrage that reverberated through
Israel when the truth was out seemed more to reflect horror at what Israel
had done to itself through its Lebanon invasion, at the dishonour and
moral turpitude people perceived at the heart of their Jewish state, than
sympathy for the victims themselves ( a feeling that is evident among
leaders of Britain’s Jewish community now, vis a vis the
intensified occupation and impasse in the Occupied Territories).
In the mid-1980s, the Israelis also had
to contend with the failure of all the aims of Ariel Sharon's Lebanon
adventure---which were, to expunge Palestinian nationalism, to crush the
PLO, and to set up a friendly pro-Zionist Christian regime in Lebanon,
well out of the clutches of Syria and the other Arabs.
Within the decade, the PLO had
recognised Israel and accepted the concept of a two-state solution. Israel
had been forced, reluctantly, to sit down to negotiate with its Arab
enemies, Syria, Lebanon, Jordan and the Palestinian movement. In 1993, it
recognised the PLO---unthinkable in 1992, let alone 1982--- and appeared
to be beginning the process of setting up an independent Palestinian
state. In 1993, the world outside the Middle East and even some of it
inside the region might have been forgiven for thinking that the era of
Sabra-Shatilla was a nightmare from a mercifully banished era.
But it has not proved so. Ariel Sharon
effortlessly survived the mild, temporary opprobrium that followed
Sabra-Shatilla, and prospered politically, staying, until now, beyond the
reach of international law for his alleged war crimes. His plan , seized
on with alacrity in the shadow of September 11, has been to identify
Palestinian nationalism with both local and international terrorism and to
act once again with all the force at his command to crush it.
Sharon’s clear, long-term aim is to
expunge the whole concept of " Palestine." After Sabra-Shatilla, his army
and agents worked assiduously in the Palestinian offices and institutions
of Beirut to steal and destroy Palestinian records, data, history,
identity, as they did again this year in Ramallah, Bethlehem, Nablus,
Jenin and Arab East Jerusalem.
This time, however, the price has been
high: Palestinian resistance has been able to induce in the Israelis a
sense of their vulnerability, that the struggle now is at home, on the
soil of all the Holy Land. The suicide bombs have damaged the
Palestinians’ image abroad and lost them much support, brought on them
from the Israelis yet greater death, destruction, division and
deprivation, and fired arguments among the leadership as to the
effectiveness and morality of such measures. But the difference between
1982 and 2002 is that the Palestinians have wounded their enemy; that
their struggle is now inside Israel and on Palestinian land that Israel' s
governments seem unable to contemplate relinquishing, not a threat over a
frontier; that a peaceful solution has been tried, and has failed.
In 1982, Ariel Sharon waited for an
excuse to pursue and vanquish the PLO in its Lebanese fastness, and a
fringe Palestinian group gave him his opportunity when it tried to kill
the Israeli Ambassador in London in the first days of June, 1982; he took
that as a casus belli; now Mr. Sharon waits to see what
opportunities a war in Iraq may provide before, perhaps, trying to
complete unfinished business.