by Tom Mitsoff
It’s the panel of figure skating judges, of course! Last week when a
French judge was suspended after admitting that she had been pressured
to help fix the final standings of the pairs figure skating event, it
was the first public admission by the bodies that govern international
skating and the Olympics that such incidents actually may take place,
though the suspicion has been there for years.
The French judge’s vote was critical. She was among five of the nine
judges -- amateur sport’s version of the Supreme Court -- who voted to
award the gold medal to the Russian duo of Elena Berezhnaya and Anton
Sikharulidze. The other four judges joining her in the majority opinion
were from Russia, China, Poland the the Ukraine. The minority opinion
judges were from the United States, Canada, Germany and Japan. If you
see a political landscape forming here, it’s not your imagination. The
Cold War is apparently alive and well among Olympics judges, and the
French judge appeared to have defected.
The International Olympic Committee Friday voted to award a second gold
medal to Canadians Jamie Sale and David Pelletier, who were the obvious
winners in the court of public opinion as well in the minds of many
long-time observers of the sport.
Figure skating judging is easy to skew is because most of us don’t
understand the finer points of a lutz, what makes a quality salchow or
how to analyze whether a triple toe loop was performed to perfection.
Ninety-nine percent of figure skating viewers know that if the skaters
don’t fall or stumble, that’s good, and that if they look perky and pick
good music, that’s also good. But most of us know when we hear
commentators like Dick Button and Scott Hamilton critique the landing
position following the triple axel, they might as well be talking about
quantum physics, because we really don’t know what the heck they are
talking about.
Ah, but the judges do. They are experts. They ought to know -- right?
Perhaps you remember some figure skating event that you watched in the
past, and you just knew that skater A had it all over skater B. But when
skater B won, you just figured that those expert judges knew more than
you and must have seen skater A bend her leg slightly during that camel
spin.
But now we know that we shouldn’t have mistrusted our untrained eyes so
much. The Russian pair apparently was supposed to win last week. In the
1998 Winter Olympics at Nagano, Japan, Berezhnaya and Sikharulidze fell
twice and missed three other elements in their two programs and still
received a silver medal for their efforts.
Russian-born Alexander Zhulin, a 1994 Olympic silver medalist who now
coaches U.S. ice dancers Naomi Lang and Peter Tchernyshev, said
deal-making to pre-determine results is rampant.
"All federations are involved, not only the Russians," he told the
Washington Post. "The Canadians are involved, the French are involved,
the Italians are involved. Everybody is trying to bring their couples,
their skaters, into first place. Everybody is trying to keep the votes
for their own country. . . .
"I think all judges from their home countries feel pressure from the
person who is president, the people in the high posts," he said. "It's
like in life -- some people are strong, and some people are weak, and
(the weak judges) just follow what their federation says. That's
corruption. . . . It's so dirty."
So until some major reform occurs in the way figure skating is judged,
enjoy it as entertainment, not sport. Watch it like you would watch
professional wrestling -- enjoy the action, but know that the results
are very likely scripted.
Mr.
Tom Mitsoff is a daily newspaper editor and syndicated
editorial columnist. His web address is
http://www.tommitsoff.com.
Source: