Israel's Pro War Virus Attacks Capitol Hill
by William Hughes
Whenever warmonger Benjamin Netanyahu, (a/k/a “Bend-the-Truth Yahoo”),
lands in Washington, D.C., he heads straight for Capitol Hill. Since
9/11, the former Israel’s Prime Minister has been repeatedly called as
a “friendly” witness before House legislative committees, and
senatorial forums, which all tend to display a pro-Israeli tilt.
The House’s Government Reform Committee is his favorite. Rep. Tom
Lantos (D-CA), who also co-chairs the House’s Human Rights Caucus, is
one of the ranking Democrats on it.
On Sept. 12, 2002, Netanyahu gave that committee its marching orders,
when he ranted, “I speak for the overwhelming majority of Israelis in
supporting a preemptive strike against Saddam’s regime.” His theme,
before the Congress, is always the same: “Israel and the U.S. must
jointly stand” against terrorism. Keep in mind, that this was weeks
before President George Bush (a/k/a “Little Bush) submitted, and the
Congress approved, the notorious pro-Iraq War Resolution.
Netanyahu also suggested, at that same hearing, that U.S. made
television programs, whose contents depict sexually explicit material
and crass materialism, be broadcast via satellite, to Iran to undermine
its conservative social, moral and religious foundations. “This is
pretty subversive stuff,” he told the committee, according to a UPI
report. He mentioned two shows that run on Fox TV, “Melrose Place” and
“Beverly Hills 90210” for transmitting. No congressmen took exception
to his gross vulgarity. It is all enough to make a Jeffersonian
Republican, like myself, want to throw up knowing that a foreign
national is manipulating the Congress to suit his Israel First agenda.
Additionally, I also wonder, “Shouldn’t Netanyahu be required to
register as an agent of a foreign principal with the Justice Department
before giving the Congress his biased spiel?” He claimed he was
speaking “as a private citizen” on behalf of the “overwhelming majority
of Israelis.” If that’s true, and if he isn’t otherwise exempted under
the law, (see, Title 22 U.S.C. 611, et seq., the “Foreign Agent
Registration Act”), then why hasn’t the Likud Party partisan registered?
It’s a sad truth that the slippery Netanyahu, whose roots are in Tel
Aviv, can gain instant access to the Congress. Meanwhile, the gallant
demand by survivors of the USS Liberty (which was deliberately attacked
by the Israelis, on June 8, 1967) for a congressional inquiry into that
premeditated and murderous incident, are blocked by the Israeli Lobby.
This damnable fact speaks volumes about the moral cowardice of the
Congress and the awesome power of the Zionist cartel.
As for the preachy Lantos, he has been in the Congress for eleven
terms, where he is a recognized expert on human rights, except for
human rights violations by (Guess who?) Israel! Embarrassing topics,
like the systematic torture of Palestinian detainees by Ariel Sharon’s
goon squads, never come up on his legislative watch. It’s strictly a
no-no. He was also one of the chief pushers of the pro-Iraq War
Resolution in the House. When Bush signed the measure, on Oct. 16, Sen.
Joseph Lieberman (D-CT), another of Netanyahu’s favorite lawmakers, and
the prime endorser in the Senate of the Resolution, could be seen
smirking, in the photo op, over the president’s left shoulder.
If Lantos permitted Israeli’s human rights violations to be
addressed, in any unfavorable light, before a committee he influences,
I’m sure the B’nai B’rith organization would immediately yank that
humanitarian award it gave him on April 26, 2002. It was at that get
together, that Lantos blasted the U.N. Conference Against Racism, held
in Durban, South Africa, as a “forum for lynching Israel.” Even though
he was at the Durban conference in his official capacity as an American
lawmaker, he walked out in support of Israel, falsely claiming the
event had been “hijacked by a group of Arab and Muslim nations.” This
is truly bizarre behavior for a member of the Congress. Lantos took an
oath of office to uphold the Republic and its values, so why is he
walking out of an important international meeting on human rights
because of criticism of Zionist Israel? Was he in Durban as a
representative of the Knesset?
Netanyahu, too, loathes the U.N. He labeled it “a house of lies.” When
teamed together, Lantos and Netanyahu resemble a 3rd rated 1920s
vaudeville act. Lantos is the straight man in the orchestrated Capitol
Hill gigs, while Netanyahu usually gives the punch lines. Both are
masters of the Arab-bashing sound bites that lackeys in the media, such
as William Bennett, Sean Hannity and Bill O’Reilly, parrot ad nauseam.
At the mentioned B’nai B'rith affair, held in San Francisco, Lantos
prophesied that the “next five years will demand a cost in trauma and
blood, it will not be easy.” Whose blood was old Tom talking about?
Iraqis? Iranians? Palestinians? Americans? Huh?
Unlike vaudeville, however, the Lantos and Netanyahu Political Show is
for real. As expected, the controlled media maintained its vow of
silence about these slick Zionist propaganda side shows. I could laugh
about it all, but as a taxpayer I remind myself, I’m helping to pay for
this Israeli pro war virus, that is leading the Republic down the path
to perdition.
William Hughes is a Baltimore attorney and the author of
"Andrew Jackson
vs. New World Order" (Authors Choice Press), which is available online.
Buy the related book (s) now:
by courtesy & © 2002 William Hughes