• Home
  • Perspectives
  • Articles
  • Columns
  • Platform
  • Poetry
    • Literature
  • Shop
    • Cart
    • My account
  • Support
    • Donation Confirmation
  • Write for us
Sign in
Welcome!Log into your account
Forgot your password?
Privacy Policy
Password recovery
Recover your password
Search
59.6 F
Los Angeles
Thursday, January 21, 2021
  • Contact MMN
  • en English
    af Afrikaanssq Albanianam Amharicar Arabichy Armenianaz Azerbaijanieu Basquebe Belarusianbn Bengalibs Bosnianbg Bulgarianca Catalanceb Cebuanony Chichewazh-CN Chinese (Simplified)zh-TW Chinese (Traditional)co Corsicanhr Croatiancs Czechda Danishnl Dutchen Englisheo Esperantoet Estoniantl Filipinofi Finnishfr Frenchfy Frisiangl Galicianka Georgiande Germanel Greekgu Gujaratiht Haitian Creoleha Hausahaw Hawaiianiw Hebrewhi Hindihmn Hmonghu Hungarianis Icelandicig Igboid Indonesianga Irishit Italianja Japanesejw Javanesekn Kannadakk Kazakhkm Khmerko Koreanku Kurdish (Kurmanji)ky Kyrgyzlo Laola Latinlv Latvianlt Lithuanianlb Luxembourgishmk Macedonianmg Malagasyms Malayml Malayalammt Maltesemi Maorimr Marathimn Mongolianmy Myanmar (Burmese)ne Nepalino Norwegianps Pashtofa Persianpl Polishpt Portuguesepa Punjabiro Romanianru Russiansm Samoangd Scottish Gaelicsr Serbianst Sesothosn Shonasd Sindhisi Sinhalask Slovaksl Slovenianso Somalies Spanishsu Sudanesesw Swahilisv Swedishtg Tajikta Tamilte Teluguth Thaitr Turkishuk Ukrainianur Urduuz Uzbekvi Vietnamesecy Welshxh Xhosayi Yiddishyo Yorubazu Zulu
Sign in
Welcome! Log into your account
Forgot your password? Get help
Privacy Policy
Password recovery
Recover your password
A password will be e-mailed to you.
Media Monitors Network (MMN)
  • Home
  • Perspectives
    • Jerusalem Israel Palestine Dome of The Rock Golden Dome

      The Abraham Accords undermined much-needed peace with Palestinians

      World Map

      Global disturbing disparities

      Globe Algeria Niger Mali Africa

      There is always a price to pay for befriending the Zionists

      Illegal Israeli Settlements

      Antisemitism claims mask a reign of political and cultural terror across…

      The Flower - Pakistan Monument at Night

      Israel in the vanguard of India’s mounting conflict with Pakistan

  • Articles
    • Man studying religious book

      Ishmael and Isaac: An Essay on the Divergent Moral Economies of…

      Mahmoud Abbas

      May Your Home Be Destroyed

      Netanyahu Lighting Hanukah Candles with His Wife and Sons

      Bibi’s Son or: Three Men in a Car

      The Map of Greater Israel

      The Man Who Jumped

      West Bank - Palestine

      Cry, Beloved Country

  • Columns
    • Progressives Must Fight With -- and In -- the Democratic Party

      Don’t Let President Biden ‘Make Us the Dupes of Our Hopes’

      Denouncing Republican Evils Can’t Do Much for the Biden Presidency Without Demanding Progressive Policies

      Denouncing Republican Evils Can’t Do Much for the Biden Presidency Without…

      Tax Revelations and Corporate Media Won’t Defeat Trump

      In 2021, the Best Way to Fight Neofascist Republicans Is to…

      Globe - East Middle - Middle East - Saudi Arabia

      Setting the Stage for the Third Decade of the 21st Century

      Tax Revelations and Corporate Media Won’t Defeat Trump

      Neera Tanden and Antony Blinken Personify the ‘Moderate’ Rot at the…

  • Platform
    • Hanukkah Lights

      Hanukkah is not hypocrisy

      The Washington Post

      “Preemptive war could risk millions of casualties. But….”

      When they shout: "We strongly condemn…"

      68

      Why Iran won’t attack Israel

      Is One Iraqi’s Self-Hatred Newsworthy?

  • Poetry
    • Literature
  • Shop
    • Cart
    • My account
  • Support
    • Donation Confirmation
  • Write for us
Home Perspectives Can you super-size a Sulzberger?
  • Perspectives

Can you super-size a Sulzberger?

By
Ahmed Amr
-
October 24, 2005
Facebook
Twitter
Pinterest
WhatsApp
Linkedin
ReddIt
Email
Print
Tumblr
Telegram
Mix
VK
Digg
LINE
Viber
Naver

    I wish we had dealt with the controversy over our coverage of WMD as soon as I became executive editor. At the time, we thought we had compelling reasons for kicking the issue down the road. The paper had just been through a major trauma, the Jayson Blair episode, and needed to regain its equilibrium. It felt somehow unsavory to begin a tenure by attacking our predecessors. I feared the WMD issue could become a crippling distraction. So it was a year before we got around to really dealing with the controversy. At that point, we published a long editors’ note acknowledging the prewar journalistic lapses, and — to my mind, at least as important – – we intensified aggressive reporting aimed at exposing the way bad or manipulated intelligence had fed the drive to war. — Bill Keller memo to NYT staff 10/21/2005

    The minute Keller’s ‘internal memo’ became public, most astute observers understood that Sulzberger had decided to throw Judith Miller to the sharks. Within a few short weeks, the Tokyo Rose of Times Square had fallen from being adulated as the reincarnation of Edward R Murrow to being unceremoniously dumped from the pay roll. The new story line is that Miller had deceived both Keller and Sulzberger.

    Keller’s memo was addressed to his colleagues from a hiding place in East Asia –” where he was seeking shelter from the aftermath of Hurricane Judy. As for Sulzberger –” he simply vanished from the public’s radar screen.

    By his own admission, Keller took a whole year to get around do “dealing with the WMD controversy.” He claims he was too busy cleaning up after Jayson Blair. This led him to fear that “the WMD issue could become a crippling distraction.” Let me suggest that Keller consider a visit to Walter Reed Hospital. There, he can take a long hard look at exactly how crippling the WMD hoax has been to thousands of Iraq veterans who went to war on the strength of manipulated intelligence.

    Keller still has the nerve to defend the war propaganda mill that was operated right under his nose with Sulzberger’s approval. He takes credit for publishing “a long editors’ note acknowledging the prewar journalistic lapses.” That infamous editorial failed to mention Judith Miller by name and blamed the WMD hoax on Iraqi exiles. It also implicitly defended the neocon architects of the WMD misinformation campaign by claiming that they too were duped by hucksters like Ahmed Chalabi –” a monster they had created and funded for a decade.

    Adding insult to injury, Keller now wants us to believe that Sulzberger spent millions of dollars to postpone the Plame investigations because of the “new menace” –” blanket waivers. Even at this late date, he wants to posture as a crusader for the free flow of information. After dumping Miller, he now insists on appropriating her alibi. The “Blanket Waiver” defense is like the Milky Way defense. Next thing you know, Keller will claim he was a victim of embedded Kit Kat wafers. Call it “The Wafer defense.”

    The New York Times is not just the nation’s paper of record. It’s a policy making institute and a major power player. It’s an ideological think tank with a huge printing press and an arsenal of high profile editorial writers like Thomas Friedman of the American Likud Party and William Safire – a ghost writer for Ariel Sharon. A reporter with Judith Miller’s credentials could not hope to find a more hospitable environment than the one offered by the ‘grey lady.’

    Miller was far from a rogue operative. Miss “Run A Muck” was awarded her license to ‘muck’ from Sulzberger –” the publisher. When Miller was given a subpoena to testify before the Grand Jury –” Sulzberger spared no cost to prevent her from making an appearance. Ultimately, it was his ass on the line and he was willing to spend millions to cover up his willing collaboration in the neocon conspiracy to market the invasion of Iraq. And it was his personal choice of colors that converted his media empire into a publisher of yellow journalism.

    One of the most disturbing elements of this sorry chapter in the history of American journalism is that Sulzberger is virtually immune from impeachment. His best defense is that he broke no law. As the master of a hereditary political fiefdom –” he feels a sense of entitlement to contaminate the nation with war fever.

    At this point, there should be little argument that Sulzberger voluntarily participated in an elaborate joint operation with the neocon brigades to make a case for invading Iraq. That raises a number of questions. What was his personal motivation? Did it have something to do with his personal ideology? Is he a neocon?

    Did the New York Times, as a commercial enterprise, stand to benefit from its cozy relationships with the Bush White House? Special access and exchanged favors obviously led to scoops which generate bottom line dividends. Was Sulzberger just another war profiteer?

    Once the war turned out to be a ‘long hard slog’ instead of a cakewalk –” Sulzberger had every incentive to cover up for the fabricated intelligence that he helped disseminate. Did that oblige him to provide rosy coverage of how things were developing in Iraq? Did he muzzle anti-war dissidents on his staff? Was his paper consciously involved in smearing those who challenged pre-war intelligence and the conduct of the war? Did he actively participate in playing down war crimes? Does that reduce him to a participant in those crimes?

    When the muck hit the fan, Sulzberger went out of his way to shield Judith Miller from Fitzgerald. It can hardly have come as a surprise that Miller’s testimony ended up implicating the paper of record as a full participant in the neocon WMD scam. It was Sulzberger himself who decided to expend millions of dollars to corporate funds to prevent Miller from appearing before the grand jury. Was he defending Miller or himself? Shouldn’t he have hired lawyers at his own personal expense? Did he misuse share holder assets to protect his own reputation and retain control of the paper? What is the exact difference between his raiding of the NYT treasury and Conrad Black getting caught with his hands in the Cookie Jar?

    Was the public self-flagellation during the Jayson Blair affair just a side show to distract readers from the WMD propaganda scandal? Sulzberger’s paper generated hundreds of articles and editorials and invited the public to enjoy a spectacle in which a young and lazy reporter was humiliated for writing fiction and passing it off as news. Was the whole sorry spectacle a desperate effort to reclaim credibility after misleading the public into war? Even Maureen Dowd, a Times columnist, is now asking if Miller’s “stint in the Alexandria jail was in part a career rehabilitation project.”

    Judith Miller was no aberration. Before the war, Thomas Friedman opined that he had no problem of going to war for oil –” so long as energy conservation policies were developed after the invasion. This former energy analyst also predicted that the invasion would bring down oil prices. William Safire publicly boasted about ghost writing editorials for Ariel Sharon. Deborah Sontag –” of the Jerusalem Bureau copied her dispatches from IDF press releases. I bring these matters up to prove that Sulzberger and his minions subscribed to a neocon foreign policy agenda. Did Sulzberger hire out Miller to the neocon war mongers at the Office of Special Plans and the White House Iraq Group? Why is it that the paper of record has yet to publish a single article on the Office of Special Plans –” the Pentagon outfit that was tasked with manufacturing intelligence?

    Sulzberger is a man who avoids the public glare. Ask your neighbors and co-workers to identify the publisher of the New York Times. Ask them what they think he looks like? Is he old? Is he bald? Is he wise? Can he –” by any stretch of the imagination –” be considered an intellectual? Is he personally qualified to be a journalist? How exactly did he become publisher of the ‘paper of record’ and the ‘first draft of history?’ Is the New York Times a ‘crippling distraction’ that prevents Americans from getting a credible account of current affairs? Does this institution hinder or enhance the free flow information? Is it permanently embedded with the government? Should Sulzberger be on the menu? Is a Sulzberger best served with tomatoes or an egg on the face? Can you super-size a Sulzberger? Is that good for your health?

    At this point, the American media consumer has two choices –” to economically cripple the New York Times with a boycott or to put more salt on the Sulzberger to neutralize its foul taste.

    • TAGS
    • about
    • account
    • acknowledging
    • adding
    • addressed
    • admission
    • affair
    • affairs
    • after
    • aftermath
    • agenda
    • aggressive
    • ahmed
    • alibi
    • American
    • americans
    • another
    • appearing
    • approval
    • argument
    • ariel
    • Ariel Sharon
    • around
    • arsenal
    • article
    Facebook
    Twitter
    Pinterest
    WhatsApp
    Linkedin
    ReddIt
    Email
    Print
    Tumblr
    Telegram
    Mix
    VK
    Digg
    LINE
    Viber
    Naver
      Previous articleSecular Holy Wars
      Next articleWe, the People vs. Zionism
      Ahmed Amr

      RELATED ARTICLESMORE FROM AUTHOR

      Jerusalem Israel Palestine Dome of The Rock Golden Dome

      The Abraham Accords undermined much-needed peace with Palestinians

      World Map

      Global disturbing disparities

      Globe Algeria Niger Mali Africa

      There is always a price to pay for befriending the Zionists

      Google Search

      MMN @ Google Play Store MMN @ Amazon Appstore

      MMN @ TwitterMMN @ FacebookMMN Feed

      Newsletter

      EDITOR PICKS

      Progressives Must Fight With -- and In -- the Democratic Party

      Don’t Let President Biden ‘Make Us the Dupes of Our Hopes’

      January 18, 2021
      Denouncing Republican Evils Can’t Do Much for the Biden Presidency Without Demanding Progressive Policies

      Denouncing Republican Evils Can’t Do Much for the Biden Presidency Without...

      January 11, 2021
      Tax Revelations and Corporate Media Won’t Defeat Trump

      In 2021, the Best Way to Fight Neofascist Republicans Is to...

      January 3, 2021

      POPULAR POSTS

      167

      The Origin of Freemasonry: The Crusaders & Templars

      April 23, 2003

      Sharon to Peres: We Control America

      November 20, 2001
      Qibla - Kaaba

      Direction of Al-Qiblah

      February 23, 2003

      POPULAR CATEGORY

      • Perspectives13742
      • News2960
      • World2660
      • Asia2307
      • Columns1325
      • Articles859
      • Health250
      • Africa234
      • Australasia120
      ABOUT US
      Media Monitors Network (MMN) is a non-profit, non-partial and non-political platform for those serious Media Contributors and Observers who crave to know and like to help to prevail the whole truth about current affairs, any disputed issue or any controversial issue by their voluntary contributions with logic, reason and rationality.
      Contact us: [email protected]
      FOLLOW US
      • About MMN
      • Disclaimer
      • Privacy Policy
      • Terms and Conditions
      • Contact
      Copyright © 2000 - MMN International Inc. All rights reserved.
      Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited.
      All other brands, logos, and product names are registered
      trademarks or service marks of their respective owners.
      ResponsiveVoice-NonCommercial licensed under 95x15
      MORE STORIES
      COVID ‘vaccine hoarding’ putting Africa at risk: WHO

      COVID ‘vaccine hoarding’ putting Africa at risk: WHO

      January 21, 2021
      Central African Republic: UN mission chief appeals for more peacekeepers

      Central African Republic: UN mission chief appeals for more peacekeepers

      January 21, 2021